<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How loud is the evidence?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/03/11/how-loud-is-the-evidence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/03/11/how-loud-is-the-evidence/</link>
	<description>The blog of John D. Cook</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 01:10:06 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Gill</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/03/11/how-loud-is-the-evidence/comment-page-1/#comment-110405</link>
		<dc:creator>John Gill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 16:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/03/11/how-loud-is-the-evidence/#comment-110405</guid>
		<description>Working with log-odds can also be convenient in software.   You can sum log-odds without worrying about underflow, whereas taking the product of lots of small probabilities will quickly get you into problems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Working with log-odds can also be convenient in software.   You can sum log-odds without worrying about underflow, whereas taking the product of lots of small probabilities will quickly get you into problems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/03/11/how-loud-is-the-evidence/comment-page-1/#comment-62349</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 16:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/03/11/how-loud-is-the-evidence/#comment-62349</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a shame this doesn&#039;t seem to be more widely embedded.  I don&#039;t care about how likely the data are under some bogus null; I care how likely they are to indicate a departure from accepted models.  I think that most non-statisticians expect this as well, rather than the opaque and noisy inference generated by tests with p-values.

Relevant:  http://twitter.com/mdreid/status/25410699681337345#</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a shame this doesn&#8217;t seem to be more widely embedded.  I don&#8217;t care about how likely the data are under some bogus null; I care how likely they are to indicate a departure from accepted models.  I think that most non-statisticians expect this as well, rather than the opaque and noisy inference generated by tests with p-values.</p>
<p>Relevant:  <a href="http://twitter.com/mdreid/status/25410699681337345#" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/mdreid/status/25410699681337345#</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Occam&#8217;s razor and Bayes&#8217; theorem &#8212; The Endeavour</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/03/11/how-loud-is-the-evidence/comment-page-1/#comment-60138</link>
		<dc:creator>Occam&#8217;s razor and Bayes&#8217; theorem &#8212; The Endeavour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 10:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/03/11/how-loud-is-the-evidence/#comment-60138</guid>
		<description>[...] How loud is the evidence? Blog posts on Bayesian statistics    ? X [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] How loud is the evidence? Blog posts on Bayesian statistics    ? X [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.293 seconds -->

