<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Contrasting Microsoft Word and LaTeX</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/04/03/microsoft-word-and-latex/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/04/03/microsoft-word-and-latex/</link>
	<description>The blog of John D. Cook</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 07:45:27 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Johannes</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/04/03/microsoft-word-and-latex/comment-page-1/#comment-40870</link>
		<dc:creator>Johannes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 23:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/04/03/microsoft-word-and-latex/#comment-40870</guid>
		<description>In my experience the 2007 version of Word shifts the graph slightly. The math capabilities are well done and in my opinion far easier to use than LaTeX&#039; while still being similar enough to type without much thought for most LaTeX users. I was able to type lectures in real-time in Word, something I wasn&#039;t able to do in LaTeX despite quite a number of documents I&#039;ve written with it.

Generally it&#039;s not a totally fair comparison, though. LaTeX struggles with many figures as does Word, however in the latter when used properly you won&#039;t have missing or misplaced figures ever (a common complaint leveled at Word). Tables are horrible to do in LaTeX, even more so if they span multiple pages. This is something far easier done in a graphical program. This holds similarly for matrices and equation arrays. Also with a well-defined set of styles there are few surprises in both worlds.

LaTeX on the other hand is able to produce virtually anything due to its gigantic library of packages. Chemical structure diagrams, chess games, musical notation, syntax-highlighted (albeit poorly) source code listings, syntax diagrams and trees, &amp;c. The list is quite long, although most of those things cater for a niche market and are only ever used by a few people. With the ability to insert figures into a document you can solve most of those problems with special software, tailored for the respective domain, too (well, not the source code one).

For things that appear in plain text, such as math, there should be native facilities but for many other things inventing a markup language in a Turing-complete document description language is quite overkill imho.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my experience the 2007 version of Word shifts the graph slightly. The math capabilities are well done and in my opinion far easier to use than LaTeX&#8217; while still being similar enough to type without much thought for most LaTeX users. I was able to type lectures in real-time in Word, something I wasn&#8217;t able to do in LaTeX despite quite a number of documents I&#8217;ve written with it.</p>
<p>Generally it&#8217;s not a totally fair comparison, though. LaTeX struggles with many figures as does Word, however in the latter when used properly you won&#8217;t have missing or misplaced figures ever (a common complaint leveled at Word). Tables are horrible to do in LaTeX, even more so if they span multiple pages. This is something far easier done in a graphical program. This holds similarly for matrices and equation arrays. Also with a well-defined set of styles there are few surprises in both worlds.</p>
<p>LaTeX on the other hand is able to produce virtually anything due to its gigantic library of packages. Chemical structure diagrams, chess games, musical notation, syntax-highlighted (albeit poorly) source code listings, syntax diagrams and trees, &amp;c. The list is quite long, although most of those things cater for a niche market and are only ever used by a few people. With the ability to insert figures into a document you can solve most of those problems with special software, tailored for the respective domain, too (well, not the source code one).</p>
<p>For things that appear in plain text, such as math, there should be native facilities but for many other things inventing a markup language in a Turing-complete document description language is quite overkill imho.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: esperanto.pro.br &#187; Blogarkivo &#187; LaTeX, ConTeXt kaj Word</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/04/03/microsoft-word-and-latex/comment-page-1/#comment-31326</link>
		<dc:creator>esperanto.pro.br &#187; Blogarkivo &#187; LaTeX, ConTeXt kaj Word</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 20:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/04/03/microsoft-word-and-latex/#comment-31326</guid>
		<description>[...] vi, kiu ankoraŭ ne pensis pri tiuj liberaj alternativoj, vidu ĉi tiun blogon kaj decidu per vi mem. Word estas bona por simplaj kaj faciltipografiaj tekstoj, sed LaTeX (kaj do [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] vi, kiu ankoraŭ ne pensis pri tiuj liberaj alternativoj, vidu ĉi tiun blogon kaj decidu per vi mem. Word estas bona por simplaj kaj faciltipografiaj tekstoj, sed LaTeX (kaj do [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ventajas del editor de texto LaTeX &#171; Bitácoras en Estadística (Alexjzc&#8217;s Blog)</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/04/03/microsoft-word-and-latex/comment-page-1/#comment-21768</link>
		<dc:creator>Ventajas del editor de texto LaTeX &#171; Bitácoras en Estadística (Alexjzc&#8217;s Blog)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 10:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/04/03/microsoft-word-and-latex/#comment-21768</guid>
		<description>[...] PDRTJS_settings_69525_post_391 = { &quot;id&quot; : &quot;69525&quot;, &quot;unique_id&quot; : &quot;wp-post-391&quot;, &quot;title&quot; : &quot;Ventajas+del+editor+de+texto+LaTeX&quot;, &quot;item_id&quot; : &quot;_post_391&quot;, &quot;permalink&quot; : &quot;http%3A%2F%2Falexjzc.wordpress.com%2F2009%2F07%2F29%2Fventajas-latex%2F&quot; } Una de mis aficiones (pasiones, gustos llamelan como quiera) es editar archivos en formatos . John Cook nos enseña un gráfico comparando este editor de texto con el programa MS Word y observamos la gran ventaja de componer un archivo en  (dar click aquí) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] PDRTJS_settings_69525_post_391 = { &#8220;id&#8221; : &#8220;69525&#8243;, &#8220;unique_id&#8221; : &#8220;wp-post-391&#8243;, &#8220;title&#8221; : &#8220;Ventajas+del+editor+de+texto+LaTeX&#8221;, &#8220;item_id&#8221; : &#8220;_post_391&#8243;, &#8220;permalink&#8221; : &#8220;http%3A%2F%2Falexjzc.wordpress.com%2F2009%2F07%2F29%2Fventajas-latex%2F&#8221; } Una de mis aficiones (pasiones, gustos llamelan como quiera) es editar archivos en formatos . John Cook nos enseña un gráfico comparando este editor de texto con el programa MS Word y observamos la gran ventaja de componer un archivo en  (dar click aquí) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Barrett</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/04/03/microsoft-word-and-latex/comment-page-1/#comment-21241</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Barrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 22:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/04/03/microsoft-word-and-latex/#comment-21241</guid>
		<description>Just to set the record straight, &lt;em&gt;LaTeX&lt;/em&gt; is properly ascribed to Leslie Lamport, who designed and wrote it using Donald Knuth&#039;s &lt;em&gt;TeX&lt;/em&gt; as the underlying engine. Knuth himself had almost nothing to do with &lt;em&gt;LaTeX&lt;/em&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to set the record straight, <em>LaTeX</em> is properly ascribed to Leslie Lamport, who designed and wrote it using Donald Knuth&#8217;s <em>TeX</em> as the underlying engine. Knuth himself had almost nothing to do with <em>LaTeX</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Doolin</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/04/03/microsoft-word-and-latex/comment-page-1/#comment-9016</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Doolin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 03:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/04/03/microsoft-word-and-latex/#comment-9016</guid>
		<description>Two things in particular:
 
1. The image is broken!  I can&#039;t see the graph!

2. I know exactly what this graph looks like because I have drawn it for people probably hundreds of times.   I don&#039;t recall whether I figured it out myself, or saw a pointer on comp.text.tex or some other place.

Google Docs is far better than it was two years ago.  I hope the next two years shows as much or more improvement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two things in particular:</p>
<p>1. The image is broken!  I can&#8217;t see the graph!</p>
<p>2. I know exactly what this graph looks like because I have drawn it for people probably hundreds of times.   I don&#8217;t recall whether I figured it out myself, or saw a pointer on comp.text.tex or some other place.</p>
<p>Google Docs is far better than it was two years ago.  I hope the next two years shows as much or more improvement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tc</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/04/03/microsoft-word-and-latex/comment-page-1/#comment-168</link>
		<dc:creator>tc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 05:20:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/04/03/microsoft-word-and-latex/#comment-168</guid>
		<description>There are a couple of things that a modern GUI-based program does better.  Tables and multi-column text come to mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are a couple of things that a modern GUI-based program does better.  Tables and multi-column text come to mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Khoa</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/04/03/microsoft-word-and-latex/comment-page-1/#comment-127</link>
		<dc:creator>Khoa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 16:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/04/03/microsoft-word-and-latex/#comment-127</guid>
		<description>John,

For documents categorized as to the left of the intersection, I think one can effectively use Google Docs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John,</p>
<p>For documents categorized as to the left of the intersection, I think one can effectively use Google Docs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.350 seconds -->
