<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A little simplicity goes a long way</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/04/09/a-little-simplicity-goes-a-long-way/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/04/09/a-little-simplicity-goes-a-long-way/</link>
	<description>The blog of John D. Cook</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:42:11 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: human mathematics</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/04/09/a-little-simplicity-goes-a-long-way/comment-page-1/#comment-136236</link>
		<dc:creator>human mathematics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 00:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/04/09/a-little-simplicity-goes-a-long-way/#comment-136236</guid>
		<description>What if the ordina represents the choice variable? It would make more sense to me that one acts on perceived complexity.

Then, reducing perceived complexity would not do much to reduce actual complexity, but could shift one&#039;s mind to a C state (not shown on the graph).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What if the ordina represents the choice variable? It would make more sense to me that one acts on perceived complexity.</p>
<p>Then, reducing perceived complexity would not do much to reduce actual complexity, but could shift one&#8217;s mind to a C state (not shown on the graph).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reducing friction and Scriptogram&#8217;s new text editor &#171; ben tsai</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/04/09/a-little-simplicity-goes-a-long-way/comment-page-1/#comment-132606</link>
		<dc:creator>Reducing friction and Scriptogram&#8217;s new text editor &#171; ben tsai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 07:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/04/09/a-little-simplicity-goes-a-long-way/#comment-132606</guid>
		<description>[...] But what this feature does is reduce the friction of writing posts even more, and that is a powerful idea. Even though the text editor is fairly bare bones (no support for links, no HTML preview, no auto-save), it eliminates the overhead of navigating the file system, creating and naming a new text file, and typing in the proper header. John D. Cook wrote a post explaining this concept that a little simplicity goes a long way: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] But what this feature does is reduce the friction of writing posts even more, and that is a powerful idea. Even though the text editor is fairly bare bones (no support for links, no HTML preview, no auto-save), it eliminates the overhead of navigating the file system, creating and naming a new text file, and typing in the proper header. John D. Cook wrote a post explaining this concept that a little simplicity goes a long way: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Compound complexity &#8212; The Endeavour</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/04/09/a-little-simplicity-goes-a-long-way/comment-page-1/#comment-103369</link>
		<dc:creator>Compound complexity &#8212; The Endeavour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 13:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/04/09/a-little-simplicity-goes-a-long-way/#comment-103369</guid>
		<description>[...] A little simplification goes a long way    ? X [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A little simplification goes a long way    ? X [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mental context switches are evil &#8212; The Endeavour</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/04/09/a-little-simplicity-goes-a-long-way/comment-page-1/#comment-87007</link>
		<dc:creator>Mental context switches are evil &#8212; The Endeavour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 12:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/04/09/a-little-simplicity-goes-a-long-way/#comment-87007</guid>
		<description>[...] language fatigue A little simplicity goes a long way    ? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] language fatigue A little simplicity goes a long way    ? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Baker</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/04/09/a-little-simplicity-goes-a-long-way/comment-page-1/#comment-50460</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Baker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 23:53:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/04/09/a-little-simplicity-goes-a-long-way/#comment-50460</guid>
		<description>You know, if there&#039;s one thing that&#039;s always annoyed me, it&#039;s hearing &quot;This isn&#039;t *that* complex.&quot;

Yeah, by itself it isn&#039;t, but complexity adds up very quickly.  Glad to see there&#039;s someone that agrees with me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, if there&#8217;s one thing that&#8217;s always annoyed me, it&#8217;s hearing &#8220;This isn&#8217;t *that* complex.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yeah, by itself it isn&#8217;t, but complexity adds up very quickly.  Glad to see there&#8217;s someone that agrees with me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathematically correct but psychologically wrong &#8212; The Endeavour</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/04/09/a-little-simplicity-goes-a-long-way/comment-page-1/#comment-50401</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathematically correct but psychologically wrong &#8212; The Endeavour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 13:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/04/09/a-little-simplicity-goes-a-long-way/#comment-50401</guid>
		<description>[...] A little simplicity goes a long way Acknowledging problems versus solving problems    ? X [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A little simplicity goes a long way Acknowledging problems versus solving problems    ? X [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bart raguso</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/04/09/a-little-simplicity-goes-a-long-way/comment-page-1/#comment-11801</link>
		<dc:creator>bart raguso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 12:21:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/04/09/a-little-simplicity-goes-a-long-way/#comment-11801</guid>
		<description>I guess what you are saying is that we are not omnipotent, that we have limits to our ability, and wisdom suggests we know how much is enough.  I think it is a keen observation to work within our tolerance level; a dull knife is dangerous.  Your remarks also imply but do not implicitly state that in order to work we must maintain a calm demeanor, there is an emotional component to everything we do.
For a rationalist programmer, you have a marvelous outlook on staying whole.  I would suggest that multi-tasking is a myth and until we get a lot more humble about a lot of things we will continue to be fubar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess what you are saying is that we are not omnipotent, that we have limits to our ability, and wisdom suggests we know how much is enough.  I think it is a keen observation to work within our tolerance level; a dull knife is dangerous.  Your remarks also imply but do not implicitly state that in order to work we must maintain a calm demeanor, there is an emotional component to everything we do.<br />
For a rationalist programmer, you have a marvelous outlook on staying whole.  I would suggest that multi-tasking is a myth and until we get a lot more humble about a lot of things we will continue to be fubar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nick senofsky</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/04/09/a-little-simplicity-goes-a-long-way/comment-page-1/#comment-159</link>
		<dc:creator>nick senofsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 18:25:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/04/09/a-little-simplicity-goes-a-long-way/#comment-159</guid>
		<description>John,
Great little article.  I agree.  This is why in GTD the author tries to get the reader to break a project out into the next 3 steps.  You can&#039;t &quot;do&quot; a project, you can only do steps of a project until all the steps are done and then the project is complete.  I believe that is more than semantics.  It is your idea above of reducing complexity by taking a complex project and making it simplier by focusing on the next few steps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John,<br />
Great little article.  I agree.  This is why in GTD the author tries to get the reader to break a project out into the next 3 steps.  You can&#8217;t &#8220;do&#8221; a project, you can only do steps of a project until all the steps are done and then the project is complete.  I believe that is more than semantics.  It is your idea above of reducing complexity by taking a complex project and making it simplier by focusing on the next few steps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.329 seconds -->

