<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fibonacci numbers at work</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/04/23/fibonacci-numbers-at-work/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/04/23/fibonacci-numbers-at-work/</link>
	<description>The blog of John D. Cook</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 01:10:06 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Online mathematics degree overview and prospects &#124; best &#8230; &#171; Resource Weblog</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/04/23/fibonacci-numbers-at-work/comment-page-1/#comment-98003</link>
		<dc:creator>Online mathematics degree overview and prospects &#124; best &#8230; &#171; Resource Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2011 18:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/04/23/fibonacci-numbers-at-work/#comment-98003</guid>
		<description>[...] Fibonacci numbers at work — The Endeavour [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Fibonacci numbers at work — The Endeavour [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Three surprises with the trapezoid rule &#8212; The Endeavour</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/04/23/fibonacci-numbers-at-work/comment-page-1/#comment-53770</link>
		<dc:creator>Three surprises with the trapezoid rule &#8212; The Endeavour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 16:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/04/23/fibonacci-numbers-at-work/#comment-53770</guid>
		<description>[...] Fibonacci rules in integration Quasi-random sequences in art and integration Three surprises with bc Ten surprises in numerical linear algebra    ? X [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Fibonacci rules in integration Quasi-random sequences in art and integration Three surprises with bc Ten surprises in numerical linear algebra    ? X [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Fibonacci numbers at work — The Endeavour -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/04/23/fibonacci-numbers-at-work/comment-page-1/#comment-40207</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Fibonacci numbers at work — The Endeavour -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 19:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/04/23/fibonacci-numbers-at-work/#comment-40207</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Katherine Koba, Algebra Fact. Algebra Fact said: Fibonacci numbers come up in applications http://bit.ly/bF2aqF [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Katherine Koba, Algebra Fact. Algebra Fact said: Fibonacci numbers come up in applications <a href="http://bit.ly/bF2aqF" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/bF2aqF</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/04/23/fibonacci-numbers-at-work/comment-page-1/#comment-14494</link>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 20:38:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/04/23/fibonacci-numbers-at-work/#comment-14494</guid>
		<description>Thanks,

I will definitely check the Sobol sequence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>I will definitely check the Sobol sequence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/04/23/fibonacci-numbers-at-work/comment-page-1/#comment-14492</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 20:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/04/23/fibonacci-numbers-at-work/#comment-14492</guid>
		<description>Paul, I have only seen Fibonacci points defined for 2D. For 3D, you could use a quasi-random sequence such as the Sobol sequence. Numerical Recipes has a description of these sequences.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul, I have only seen Fibonacci points defined for 2D. For 3D, you could use a quasi-random sequence such as the Sobol sequence. Numerical Recipes has a description of these sequences.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/04/23/fibonacci-numbers-at-work/comment-page-1/#comment-14490</link>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 20:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/04/23/fibonacci-numbers-at-work/#comment-14490</guid>
		<description>Interesting post.
It is possible to generate a Fibonacci sequence for a 3D function ?
I was thinking as something like:

j/Fk(1,Fk-1,Fk-2)

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post.<br />
It is possible to generate a Fibonacci sequence for a 3D function ?<br />
I was thinking as something like:</p>
<p>j/Fk(1,Fk-1,Fk-2)</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Hogg</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/04/23/fibonacci-numbers-at-work/comment-page-1/#comment-310</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Hogg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 04:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/04/23/fibonacci-numbers-at-work/#comment-310</guid>
		<description>There really is something about seeing the old-school examples pop up in the real world...I think it speaks volumes about the way we are all, at some level, verschulert to the point that even the most avid learner starts to believe that the things of education are part of a mythical world only loosely related to reality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There really is something about seeing the old-school examples pop up in the real world&#8230;I think it speaks volumes about the way we are all, at some level, verschulert to the point that even the most avid learner starts to believe that the things of education are part of a mythical world only loosely related to reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jimcp</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/04/23/fibonacci-numbers-at-work/comment-page-1/#comment-235</link>
		<dc:creator>jimcp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 20:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/04/23/fibonacci-numbers-at-work/#comment-235</guid>
		<description>Never seen the formula written like ((GoldenRatio)^n - (-GoldenRatio)^-n)/Sqrt[5] as you do, but it is correct and I liked it ( but mathematicians should be conservative to preserve past work ).

The most efficient way of calculating the Fibonacci numbers I have found thus far is f(n_):=Floor[(GoldenRatio)^n/Sqrt[5]+0.5]. (Using Mathematica syntax)

I like your blog and have added it to Math Blogs on http://mathematics-diary.blogspot.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never seen the formula written like ((GoldenRatio)^n &#8211; (-GoldenRatio)^-n)/Sqrt[5] as you do, but it is correct and I liked it ( but mathematicians should be conservative to preserve past work ).</p>
<p>The most efficient way of calculating the Fibonacci numbers I have found thus far is f(n_):=Floor[(GoldenRatio)^n/Sqrt[5]+0.5]. (Using Mathematica syntax)</p>
<p>I like your blog and have added it to Math Blogs on <a href="http://mathematics-diary.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://mathematics-diary.blogspot.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Guest</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/04/23/fibonacci-numbers-at-work/comment-page-1/#comment-227</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 12:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/04/23/fibonacci-numbers-at-work/#comment-227</guid>
		<description>One interesting thing about these classic sequences is that they grow very quickly. So if you&#039;re programming in C++ with fixed width integers, int Fibonacci(int) might as well use a simple lookup table. For a 4 byte int, you&#039;d need fewer than 50 entries. And int Factorial(int) would only need 13 entries! Of course you&#039;d still use a program to calculate these entries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One interesting thing about these classic sequences is that they grow very quickly. So if you&#8217;re programming in C++ with fixed width integers, int Fibonacci(int) might as well use a simple lookup table. For a 4 byte int, you&#8217;d need fewer than 50 entries. And int Factorial(int) would only need 13 entries! Of course you&#8217;d still use a program to calculate these entries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.422 seconds -->

