<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bias</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/05/07/bias/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/05/07/bias/</link>
	<description>The blog of John D. Cook</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 01:10:06 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bias and consistency &#8212; The Endeavour</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/05/07/bias/comment-page-1/#comment-50310</link>
		<dc:creator>Bias and consistency &#8212; The Endeavour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 12:17:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/05/07/bias/#comment-50310</guid>
		<description>[...] Suppose you have two ways to estimate something you&#8217;re interested in. One is biased and one is unbiased. Surely the unbiased method is better, right? Not necessarily. Statistical bias is not as bad as it sounds. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Suppose you have two ways to estimate something you&#8217;re interested in. One is biased and one is unbiased. Surely the unbiased method is better, right? Not necessarily. Statistical bias is not as bad as it sounds. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.275 seconds -->

