Comments on: Barriers to good statistical software http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/05/16/barriers-to-good-statistical-software/ The blog of John D. Cook Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:42:11 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: John http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/05/16/barriers-to-good-statistical-software/comment-page-1/#comment-7734 John Mon, 13 Oct 2008 21:30:08 +0000 http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/05/16/barriers-to-good-statistical-software/#comment-7734 The conference consisted of several people giving short presentations. I don't think any of the presentations were published online. Here is a document from the NCI regarding an RFP that came out of the meeting: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/SBIRContract/PHS2009-1.doc The conference consisted of several people giving short presentations. I don’t think any of the presentations were published online.

Here is a document from the NCI regarding an RFP that came out of the meeting:
http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/SBIRContract/PHS2009-1.doc

]]> By: Pallabi Saboo http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/05/16/barriers-to-good-statistical-software/comment-page-1/#comment-7727 Pallabi Saboo Mon, 13 Oct 2008 19:54:26 +0000 http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/05/16/barriers-to-good-statistical-software/#comment-7727 John How do I get the information presented at this conference Pallabi John

How do I get the information presented at this conference

Pallabi

]]> By: Rory http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/05/16/barriers-to-good-statistical-software/comment-page-1/#comment-618 Rory Tue, 20 May 2008 17:07:33 +0000 http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/05/16/barriers-to-good-statistical-software/#comment-618 It seems crazy that academics who publish these kind of papers are not required to make available their data and methods, unless there are commercial considerations involved. Surely this subtly undermines the whole idea of academic integrity? It seems unclear what role academic referees have to play - are they just a formal rubber stamp? It seems little wonder that such a huge percentage of academic output is destined for obscurity the instant it is published. It seems crazy that academics who publish these kind of papers are not required to make available their data and methods, unless there are commercial considerations involved. Surely this subtly undermines the whole idea of academic integrity? It seems unclear what role academic referees have to play – are they just a formal rubber stamp? It seems little wonder that such a huge percentage of academic output is destined for obscurity the instant it is published.

]]>