<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Approximate problems and approximate solutions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/07/10/approximate-problems-and-approximate-solutions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/07/10/approximate-problems-and-approximate-solutions/</link>
	<description>The blog of John D. Cook</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:42:11 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Phil H</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/07/10/approximate-problems-and-approximate-solutions/comment-page-1/#comment-19820</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 08:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/07/10/approximate-problems-and-approximate-solutions/#comment-19820</guid>
		<description>One more thing in favour of approximate solutions: they are generally more quickly obtained, so they are usable sooner. If you can discover today that roughly half your customers cannot use your online payment system, that&#039;s worth far more than knowing that 46.2% of them were having problems in a week&#039;s time.

Put another way, Google could sit and calculate exactly the most relevant page it ever found for your search on &quot;first aid cut finger&quot;, but you&#039;d rather have the answer *now*.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One more thing in favour of approximate solutions: they are generally more quickly obtained, so they are usable sooner. If you can discover today that roughly half your customers cannot use your online payment system, that&#8217;s worth far more than knowing that 46.2% of them were having problems in a week&#8217;s time.</p>
<p>Put another way, Google could sit and calculate exactly the most relevant page it ever found for your search on &#8220;first aid cut finger&#8221;, but you&#8217;d rather have the answer *now*.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Venier</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/07/10/approximate-problems-and-approximate-solutions/comment-page-1/#comment-2582</link>
		<dc:creator>John Venier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 17:56:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/07/10/approximate-problems-and-approximate-solutions/#comment-2582</guid>
		<description>My favorite story along those lines is the old chestnut about the fellow looking for his wallet at night under a streetlamp, when he lost it a block away, because the light was better.

Regarding improving the saying, what about:

&lt;blockquote&gt;An approximate answer to the right problem is worth a good deal more than an exact answer to the wrong problem.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My favorite story along those lines is the old chestnut about the fellow looking for his wallet at night under a streetlamp, when he lost it a block away, because the light was better.</p>
<p>Regarding improving the saying, what about:</p>
<blockquote><p>An approximate answer to the right problem is worth a good deal more than an exact answer to the wrong problem.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Gelman</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/07/10/approximate-problems-and-approximate-solutions/comment-page-1/#comment-2468</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Gelman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 00:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/07/10/approximate-problems-and-approximate-solutions/#comment-2468</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t like Tukey&#039;s saying.  It&#039;s too crudely lexicographical.  Which is better has got to depend on how good each of the two approximations are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t like Tukey&#8217;s saying.  It&#8217;s too crudely lexicographical.  Which is better has got to depend on how good each of the two approximations are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.309 seconds -->

