<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Good user interface design: EpiPen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/08/08/good-user-interface-design-epipen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/08/08/good-user-interface-design-epipen/</link>
	<description>The blog of John D. Cook</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:42:11 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Clutter-discoverability trade-off &#8212; The Endeavour</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/08/08/good-user-interface-design-epipen/comment-page-1/#comment-87577</link>
		<dc:creator>Clutter-discoverability trade-off &#8212; The Endeavour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 14:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/08/08/good-user-interface-design-epipen/#comment-87577</guid>
		<description>[...] helpful software really helpful? Good user interface design: EpiPen Bad user interface design: hotel showers    ? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] helpful software really helpful? Good user interface design: EpiPen Bad user interface design: hotel showers    ? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Carpenter</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/08/08/good-user-interface-design-epipen/comment-page-1/#comment-4056</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Carpenter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 21:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/08/08/good-user-interface-design-epipen/#comment-4056</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s a very nice related case study in Clayton Christensen&#039;s &lt;i&gt;The Innovator&#039;s Dilemma&lt;/i&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.readnsurf.com/business/2.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;relevant bits excerpted here&lt;/a&gt;.  He discusses the development of an easy-to-inject insulin system by Novo at the same time Lilly developed much purer insulin.  The latter was a huge engineering/scientific breakthrough by Lilly that made insulin less likely to be rejected by deriving it from humans rather than pigs.  Novo developed an easy-to-inject insulin pen system that had the same old 1/10K rejection rate, but gained market share.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a very nice related case study in Clayton Christensen&#8217;s <i>The Innovator&#8217;s Dilemma</i> (<a href="http://www.readnsurf.com/business/2.html" rel="nofollow">relevant bits excerpted here</a>.  He discusses the development of an easy-to-inject insulin system by Novo at the same time Lilly developed much purer insulin.  The latter was a huge engineering/scientific breakthrough by Lilly that made insulin less likely to be rejected by deriving it from humans rather than pigs.  Novo developed an easy-to-inject insulin pen system that had the same old 1/10K rejection rate, but gained market share.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.285 seconds -->

