<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quantifying the error in the central limit theorem</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/09/30/quantifying-the-error-in-the-central-limit-theorem/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/09/30/quantifying-the-error-in-the-central-limit-theorem/</link>
	<description>The blog of John D. Cook</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:42:11 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Quantifying the error in the central limit theorem — The Endeavour -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/09/30/quantifying-the-error-in-the-central-limit-theorem/comment-page-1/#comment-56374</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Quantifying the error in the central limit theorem — The Endeavour -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 17:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=419#comment-56374</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Ed Gonzales. Ed Gonzales said: RT @ProbFact: The Berry-Esséen theorem quantifies the error in approximations based on the central limit theorem. http://bit.ly/73R7Nk [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Ed Gonzales. Ed Gonzales said: RT @ProbFact: The Berry-Esséen theorem quantifies the error in approximations based on the central limit theorem. <a href="http://bit.ly/73R7Nk" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/73R7Nk</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/09/30/quantifying-the-error-in-the-central-limit-theorem/comment-page-1/#comment-10435</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 22:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=419#comment-10435</guid>
		<description>Patrick: I&#039;m not aware of a result like you&#039;re looking for. I suspect you may not find one. The Berry-Esse&#233;n theorem is very general, and so it&#039;s often pessimistic in specific applications, and apparently not too much has been published for more particular cases.  You might try the book I linked to above. Maybe it would point you to a useful reference. Sorry I couldn&#039;t be more help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patrick: I&#8217;m not aware of a result like you&#8217;re looking for. I suspect you may not find one. The Berry-Esse&eacute;n theorem is very general, and so it&#8217;s often pessimistic in specific applications, and apparently not too much has been published for more particular cases.  You might try the book I linked to above. Maybe it would point you to a useful reference. Sorry I couldn&#8217;t be more help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/09/30/quantifying-the-error-in-the-central-limit-theorem/comment-page-1/#comment-10432</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 20:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=419#comment-10432</guid>
		<description>I am looking for a refinement of the Berry-Esseen constant when the initial distribution has some &quot;good&quot; properties. In my specific case, I&#039;d like to use the Berry-Esseen theorem with a histogram distribution. Using the standard approximation (C=0.75) yields a relative error of 0.05 ; while a simulation shows a relative error of less than 0.001. Are you aware of such a result ? Thanks in advance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am looking for a refinement of the Berry-Esseen constant when the initial distribution has some &#8220;good&#8221; properties. In my specific case, I&#8217;d like to use the Berry-Esseen theorem with a histogram distribution. Using the standard approximation (C=0.75) yields a relative error of 0.05 ; while a simulation shows a relative error of less than 0.001. Are you aware of such a result ? Thanks in advance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The 41st Carnival of Mathematics &#171; 360</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/09/30/quantifying-the-error-in-the-central-limit-theorem/comment-page-1/#comment-7588</link>
		<dc:creator>The 41st Carnival of Mathematics &#171; 360</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 23:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=419#comment-7588</guid>
		<description>[...] assume a sufficiently large number of samples. John Cook, from The Endeavor, wants to know about quantifying the error in the central limit theorem, and how close an approximation we can really get. He also compares three methods of computing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] assume a sufficiently large number of samples. John Cook, from The Endeavor, wants to know about quantifying the error in the central limit theorem, and how close an approximation we can really get. He also compares three methods of computing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/09/30/quantifying-the-error-in-the-central-limit-theorem/comment-page-1/#comment-7217</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 08:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=419#comment-7217</guid>
		<description>The links to the distribution families don&#039;t work. These seem to be the correct ones:
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.johndcook.com/normal_approx_to_beta.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;beta&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.johndcook.com/normal_approx_to_binomial.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;binomial&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.johndcook.com/normal_approx_to_gamma.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;gamma&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.johndcook.com/normal_approx_to_poisson.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Poisson&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.johndcook.com/normal_approx_to_t.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;t&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The links to the distribution families don&#8217;t work. These seem to be the correct ones:<br />
<a href="http://www.johndcook.com/normal_approx_to_beta.html" rel="nofollow">beta</a><br />
<a href="http://www.johndcook.com/normal_approx_to_binomial.html" rel="nofollow">binomial</a><br />
<a href="http://www.johndcook.com/normal_approx_to_gamma.html" rel="nofollow">gamma</a><br />
<a href="http://www.johndcook.com/normal_approx_to_poisson.html" rel="nofollow">Poisson</a><br />
<a href="http://www.johndcook.com/normal_approx_to_t.html" rel="nofollow">t</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.336 seconds -->

