<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Testing and getting nowhere</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/10/02/testing-and-getting-nowhere/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/10/02/testing-and-getting-nowhere/</link>
	<description>The blog of John D. Cook</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 01:10:06 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The single big jump principle &#8212; The Endeavour</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/10/02/testing-and-getting-nowhere/comment-page-1/#comment-97428</link>
		<dc:creator>The single big jump principle &#8212; The Endeavour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 13:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=487#comment-97428</guid>
		<description>[...] are subexponential? Any heavy-tailed distribution you&#8217;re likely to have heard of: Cauchy, Lévy, Weibull (with shape &lt; 1), log-normal, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] are subexponential? Any heavy-tailed distribution you&#8217;re likely to have heard of: Cauchy, Lévy, Weibull (with shape &lt; 1), log-normal, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EastwoodDC</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/10/02/testing-and-getting-nowhere/comment-page-1/#comment-7296</link>
		<dc:creator>EastwoodDC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 16:12:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=487#comment-7296</guid>
		<description>Someone once came to ask me about the problems they were having with their stats. It turns out they were essentially taking the ratio of two normals. I had to explain that this was a bad idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone once came to ask me about the problems they were having with their stats. It turns out they were essentially taking the ratio of two normals. I had to explain that this was a bad idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Venier</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/10/02/testing-and-getting-nowhere/comment-page-1/#comment-7292</link>
		<dc:creator>John Venier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 15:51:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=487#comment-7292</guid>
		<description>Or you could get Cauchys by just taking the quotient of two independant standard normal random numbers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or you could get Cauchys by just taking the quotient of two independant standard normal random numbers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.380 seconds -->

