<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Watch what you name graphics files in LaTeX</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/10/11/watch-what-you-name-graphics-files-in-latex/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/10/11/watch-what-you-name-graphics-files-in-latex/</link>
	<description>The blog of John D. Cook</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:42:11 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mahzabin</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/10/11/watch-what-you-name-graphics-files-in-latex/comment-page-1/#comment-127552</link>
		<dc:creator>Mahzabin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 07:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=523#comment-127552</guid>
		<description>Hello, 
I am a new user of Beamer. I found, I can include 5 (.png) graphics only (total size of those are 1MB). 
Is there any way to include more than 1MB?
Can you please tell how can I include more ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,<br />
I am a new user of Beamer. I found, I can include 5 (.png) graphics only (total size of those are 1MB).<br />
Is there any way to include more than 1MB?<br />
Can you please tell how can I include more ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kk</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/10/11/watch-what-you-name-graphics-files-in-latex/comment-page-1/#comment-96093</link>
		<dc:creator>kk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 17:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=523#comment-96093</guid>
		<description>Or, one could use the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tug.org/texlive/Contents/live/texmf-dist/doc/latex/oberdiek/grffile.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;grffile package&lt;/a&gt; !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or, one could use the <a href="http://www.tug.org/texlive/Contents/live/texmf-dist/doc/latex/oberdiek/grffile.pdf" rel="nofollow">grffile package</a> !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Brown</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/10/11/watch-what-you-name-graphics-files-in-latex/comment-page-1/#comment-96070</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 14:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=523#comment-96070</guid>
		<description>I was expecting this to be about the -/_ bugginess in graphicx -- always go with hyphens, when possible; underscores can lead to unexpected and difficult to debug problems (at least on my Mac OS X Snow Leopard with latest TeX dist).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was expecting this to be about the -/_ bugginess in graphicx &#8212; always go with hyphens, when possible; underscores can lead to unexpected and difficult to debug problems (at least on my Mac OS X Snow Leopard with latest TeX dist).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweev</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/10/11/watch-what-you-name-graphics-files-in-latex/comment-page-1/#comment-73589</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 16:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=523#comment-73589</guid>
		<description>My vote goes for feature. IIRC TeX also runs on naive platforms, like DOS. Maybe that&#039;s for compatibility reasons...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My vote goes for feature. IIRC TeX also runs on naive platforms, like DOS. Maybe that&#8217;s for compatibility reasons&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JWM</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/10/11/watch-what-you-name-graphics-files-in-latex/comment-page-1/#comment-53513</link>
		<dc:creator>JWM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 01:52:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=523#comment-53513</guid>
		<description>I ran into this same issue yesterday with \input{file}, so I don&#039;t think it&#039;s only a problem with the graphics package.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I ran into this same issue yesterday with \input{file}, so I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s only a problem with the graphics package.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Watch what you name graphics files in LaTeX — The Endeavour -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/10/11/watch-what-you-name-graphics-files-in-latex/comment-page-1/#comment-53442</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Watch what you name graphics files in LaTeX — The Endeavour -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 16:58:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=523#comment-53442</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by PP-Biologia-UAMX, TeX tips. TeX tips said: Watch what you name graphics in LaTeX http://bit.ly/aH0n1l [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by PP-Biologia-UAMX, TeX tips. TeX tips said: Watch what you name graphics in LaTeX <a href="http://bit.ly/aH0n1l" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/aH0n1l</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dhill</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/10/11/watch-what-you-name-graphics-files-in-latex/comment-page-1/#comment-17004</link>
		<dc:creator>dhill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 23:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=523#comment-17004</guid>
		<description>I just got burned by that... I say it&#039;s a bug.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just got burned by that&#8230; I say it&#8217;s a bug.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: watson aname</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/10/11/watch-what-you-name-graphics-files-in-latex/comment-page-1/#comment-15193</link>
		<dc:creator>watson aname</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 20:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=523#comment-15193</guid>
		<description>You are best off avoiding suffixes entirely, that way if you have multiple versions of a file (a .eps and a .png, say)  \includegraphics  will pick the right one for you depending on context.

In otherwords \includegraphics{file}  will find file.png if you are in pdflatex, and file.eps if you are in latex.  It sounds a bit wonky, but turns out to work well in complicated situations where you may want do generate different output from related files.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are best off avoiding suffixes entirely, that way if you have multiple versions of a file (a .eps and a .png, say)  \includegraphics  will pick the right one for you depending on context.</p>
<p>In otherwords \includegraphics{file}  will find file.png if you are in pdflatex, and file.eps if you are in latex.  It sounds a bit wonky, but turns out to work well in complicated situations where you may want do generate different output from related files.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/10/11/watch-what-you-name-graphics-files-in-latex/comment-page-1/#comment-7716</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 16:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=523#comment-7716</guid>
		<description>I suppose the heart of the matter is that we&#039;re not dealing with LaTeX per se but the graphics package. I doubt LaTeX it self would have done this. I think it would have been better for the package to disregard file extensions entirely, following Unix conventions, rather than doing something that&#039;s not going to make Unix or Windows people happy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose the heart of the matter is that we&#8217;re not dealing with LaTeX per se but the graphics package. I doubt LaTeX it self would have done this. I think it would have been better for the package to disregard file extensions entirely, following Unix conventions, rather than doing something that&#8217;s not going to make Unix or Windows people happy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Venier</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/10/11/watch-what-you-name-graphics-files-in-latex/comment-page-1/#comment-7714</link>
		<dc:creator>John Venier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 16:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=523#comment-7714</guid>
		<description>Probably a bug in this case, but IIRC the perl filename parser lets you define the boundary between basename and extension.  If so, then presumably there are some occasions where non-standard extensions are used, if only in someone&#039;s perl code.

My recollection from my days of primarily working in Unix is that the OS doesn&#039;t have much to do with extensions -- they were more often created, used, and understood by specific applications.  Thus it is much more likely that extensions are longer than 3 characters and may have unusual characters in them.  The OS basically only distiguishes between executable and non-executable files (and directories of course).  Some applications look at the header of a file for attributes, too.

This may have changed with the more common use of windows and desktops on *nix machines.  Presumably in that case one would want more specific information about file types for use in context-specific behavior, double-clicking, and right-clicking.

Anyway, since LaTeX grew up in Unix environments, the parser may not be &#039;naive&#039; so much as conforming with the possible vagaries of Unix filename extensions.

That&#039;s why I&#039;d say it is a bug in this case -- since John is using LaTeX on a Windows machine, the parser should default to Windows standards.  Perl does this by defaulting to the conventions for the OS determined when it is built.

A primarily-Unix user might think that just grabbing the bits after the last dot would be naive behavior!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably a bug in this case, but IIRC the perl filename parser lets you define the boundary between basename and extension.  If so, then presumably there are some occasions where non-standard extensions are used, if only in someone&#8217;s perl code.</p>
<p>My recollection from my days of primarily working in Unix is that the OS doesn&#8217;t have much to do with extensions &#8212; they were more often created, used, and understood by specific applications.  Thus it is much more likely that extensions are longer than 3 characters and may have unusual characters in them.  The OS basically only distiguishes between executable and non-executable files (and directories of course).  Some applications look at the header of a file for attributes, too.</p>
<p>This may have changed with the more common use of windows and desktops on *nix machines.  Presumably in that case one would want more specific information about file types for use in context-specific behavior, double-clicking, and right-clicking.</p>
<p>Anyway, since LaTeX grew up in Unix environments, the parser may not be &#8216;naive&#8217; so much as conforming with the possible vagaries of Unix filename extensions.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s why I&#8217;d say it is a bug in this case &#8212; since John is using LaTeX on a Windows machine, the parser should default to Windows standards.  Perl does this by defaulting to the conventions for the OS determined when it is built.</p>
<p>A primarily-Unix user might think that just grabbing the bits after the last dot would be naive behavior!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clift Norris</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/10/11/watch-what-you-name-graphics-files-in-latex/comment-page-1/#comment-7620</link>
		<dc:creator>Clift Norris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 18:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=523#comment-7620</guid>
		<description>Is that a bug or a feature?  In my experience that is REALLY naive, but maybe there are reasons for it in operating systems other than Windows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is that a bug or a feature?  In my experience that is REALLY naive, but maybe there are reasons for it in operating systems other than Windows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.413 seconds -->

