<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Networks and power laws</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/10/19/networks-and-power-laws/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/10/19/networks-and-power-laws/</link>
	<description>The blog of John D. Cook</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 01:10:06 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jan Theodore Galkowski</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/10/19/networks-and-power-laws/comment-page-1/#comment-14109</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan Theodore Galkowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 23:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=679#comment-14109</guid>
		<description>Yes, there&#039;s a cost to maintain links in many natural and engineered systems.  For instance, if there are communities and circles of friends, they don&#039;t count much and don&#039;t exert much influence if they aren&#039;t nudged and spoken to for long periods of time.  A network hub can&#039;t have arbitrarily many connections, even if a scaled-up version of the hub (think Google) can serve a bunch.

But, OTOH, there are counterintuitive phenomena as well, perhaps not really networks, but phenomena of &lt;i&gt;large scale synchronization&lt;/i&gt;. There&#039;s a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/323/5914/614&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;report in a recent issue of &lt;i&gt;Science&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt; which addresses &quot;Dynamical Quorum Sensing and Synchronization in Large Populations of Chemical Oscillators&quot; where it seems &lt;i&gt;easier&lt;/i&gt; to get components to communicate the more there are.  This &lt;i&gt;seems&lt;/i&gt; like a &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_effect&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;network effect&lt;/a&gt; although I don&#039;t know whether or not there are actual &lt;i&gt;links&lt;/i&gt; in these collections.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, there&#8217;s a cost to maintain links in many natural and engineered systems.  For instance, if there are communities and circles of friends, they don&#8217;t count much and don&#8217;t exert much influence if they aren&#8217;t nudged and spoken to for long periods of time.  A network hub can&#8217;t have arbitrarily many connections, even if a scaled-up version of the hub (think Google) can serve a bunch.</p>
<p>But, OTOH, there are counterintuitive phenomena as well, perhaps not really networks, but phenomena of <i>large scale synchronization</i>. There&#8217;s a <a href="http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/323/5914/614" rel="nofollow">report in a recent issue of <i>Science</i></a> which addresses &#8220;Dynamical Quorum Sensing and Synchronization in Large Populations of Chemical Oscillators&#8221; where it seems <i>easier</i> to get components to communicate the more there are.  This <i>seems</i> like a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_effect" rel="nofollow">network effect</a> although I don&#8217;t know whether or not there are actual <i>links</i> in these collections.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/10/19/networks-and-power-laws/comment-page-1/#comment-8198</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 17:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=679#comment-8198</guid>
		<description>Interesting! If I get time I&#039;d like to try having a ceiling on the number of connections, as in practice one person cannot know (for any reasonable definition) an unlimited number of  others, and a street network or even airport network can have even fewer node-node connections.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting! If I get time I&#8217;d like to try having a ceiling on the number of connections, as in practice one person cannot know (for any reasonable definition) an unlimited number of  others, and a street network or even airport network can have even fewer node-node connections.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.308 seconds -->

