<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sales tax included</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2009/01/12/sales-tax-included/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2009/01/12/sales-tax-included/</link>
	<description>The blog of John D. Cook</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 01:10:06 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Venier</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2009/01/12/sales-tax-included/comment-page-1/#comment-20033</link>
		<dc:creator>John Venier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 18:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=1206#comment-20033</guid>
		<description>Kevin,

Douglas and Pieter got the answer right.  Thanks, guys!

As far as a reference goes, it was in an issue of Games Magazine.  They have a web site &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gamesmagazine-online.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.  It must have been in a 2008 issue.  I believe it was in their &quot;Wild Cards&quot; section, printed on slick color paper instead of the pencil friendly paper they use almost everywhere else.  I&#039;ll see if I still have it hanging around.  It is usually quite some time before I&#039;m finished with an issue.  If not and you need the reference for some reason, I&#039;d imagine the folks at Kappa Publishing (Games&#039; publisher) would help.  By the way, Games is and has been the best puzzle magazine I&#039;ve ever seen.  They also have a less-frequently published &quot;Games&#039; World of Puzzles&quot; serial which is excellent.  Anything they make is absolutely top-notch.  If I&#039;m not mistaken, even the superhuman and most brilliant Henry Hook used to write for them.  If there should be a patron saint of crosswords (especially cryptics) he&#039;d be an excellent choice IMO.  If you prefer more logical / arithmetic puzzles check out Conceptis online (from Japan).  Extremely good puzzles, and very, very prolific.  Plus, they put weekly samples online for free (I think registration is required though).  They even send out t-shirts to random puzzle reviewers, but I&#039;ve never got one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin,</p>
<p>Douglas and Pieter got the answer right.  Thanks, guys!</p>
<p>As far as a reference goes, it was in an issue of Games Magazine.  They have a web site <a href="http://www.gamesmagazine-online.com/" rel="nofollow">here</a>.  It must have been in a 2008 issue.  I believe it was in their &#8220;Wild Cards&#8221; section, printed on slick color paper instead of the pencil friendly paper they use almost everywhere else.  I&#8217;ll see if I still have it hanging around.  It is usually quite some time before I&#8217;m finished with an issue.  If not and you need the reference for some reason, I&#8217;d imagine the folks at Kappa Publishing (Games&#8217; publisher) would help.  By the way, Games is and has been the best puzzle magazine I&#8217;ve ever seen.  They also have a less-frequently published &#8220;Games&#8217; World of Puzzles&#8221; serial which is excellent.  Anything they make is absolutely top-notch.  If I&#8217;m not mistaken, even the superhuman and most brilliant Henry Hook used to write for them.  If there should be a patron saint of crosswords (especially cryptics) he&#8217;d be an excellent choice IMO.  If you prefer more logical / arithmetic puzzles check out Conceptis online (from Japan).  Extremely good puzzles, and very, very prolific.  Plus, they put weekly samples online for free (I think registration is required though).  They even send out t-shirts to random puzzle reviewers, but I&#8217;ve never got one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pieter</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2009/01/12/sales-tax-included/comment-page-1/#comment-20002</link>
		<dc:creator>Pieter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 09:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=1206#comment-20002</guid>
		<description>Kevin, the caveat is that the relative amount of non-water in a watermelon doubled, while non of it was lost, hence the amount of water is actually halved.

At start, 1% non -water = 10 kilo, at arrival only water is lost, and that 10 kilo is now 2% of the watermelon, so 100% would be 500 kilo. (this of course assumes the 99% refers to the weight and not the volume, but I guess that&#039;s implied...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin, the caveat is that the relative amount of non-water in a watermelon doubled, while non of it was lost, hence the amount of water is actually halved.</p>
<p>At start, 1% non -water = 10 kilo, at arrival only water is lost, and that 10 kilo is now 2% of the watermelon, so 100% would be 500 kilo. (this of course assumes the 99% refers to the weight and not the volume, but I guess that&#8217;s implied&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Douglas</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2009/01/12/sales-tax-included/comment-page-1/#comment-20000</link>
		<dc:creator>Douglas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 08:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=1206#comment-20000</guid>
		<description>At the start:
&lt;code&gt;
1000 kg watermelon
= 990 kg water + 10 kg non-water

At end:
10 kg = 2% (non-water)
100% = 10 * (100/2)
  = 500kg
&lt;/code&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the start:<br />
<code><br />
1000 kg watermelon<br />
= 990 kg water + 10 kg non-water</p>
<p>At end:<br />
10 kg = 2% (non-water)<br />
100% = 10 * (100/2)<br />
  = 500kg<br />
</code></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2009/01/12/sales-tax-included/comment-page-1/#comment-19980</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 02:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=1206#comment-19980</guid>
		<description>So... a little late here, but any solution or references for the watermelon question?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So&#8230; a little late here, but any solution or references for the watermelon question?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Adams</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2009/01/12/sales-tax-included/comment-page-1/#comment-11994</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 14:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=1206#comment-11994</guid>
		<description>Methinks the farmer got stopped by bandits with a thirst for watermelon juice.  Or he had to walk a thousand miles across the desert.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Methinks the farmer got stopped by bandits with a thirst for watermelon juice.  Or he had to walk a thousand miles across the desert.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Venier</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2009/01/12/sales-tax-included/comment-page-1/#comment-11982</link>
		<dc:creator>John Venier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 01:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=1206#comment-11982</guid>
		<description>Yeah, you can see the same thing when folks think about applying successive discounts on sale items.  A coupon good for 10% off any purchase, applied to an item which has already been discounted by 20%, results in a 28% discount as opposed to a 30% discount.

Another great example of surprising percentages was in a reccent issue of Games magazine.  I&#039;ll paraphrase from memory:

A farmer goes to market starting with 1000 kilos of watermelons, which are 99% water.  But on the way there, the watermelons lose some water.  When he arrives, they are 98% water instead of 99%.  How much does his load of watermelons weigh when he arrives at the market?  First make a wild guess before working out the exact answer.  I was amazed!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, you can see the same thing when folks think about applying successive discounts on sale items.  A coupon good for 10% off any purchase, applied to an item which has already been discounted by 20%, results in a 28% discount as opposed to a 30% discount.</p>
<p>Another great example of surprising percentages was in a reccent issue of Games magazine.  I&#8217;ll paraphrase from memory:</p>
<p>A farmer goes to market starting with 1000 kilos of watermelons, which are 99% water.  But on the way there, the watermelons lose some water.  When he arrives, they are 98% water instead of 99%.  How much does his load of watermelons weigh when he arrives at the market?  First make a wild guess before working out the exact answer.  I was amazed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Peng</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2009/01/12/sales-tax-included/comment-page-1/#comment-11981</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Peng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 23:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=1206#comment-11981</guid>
		<description>Hmm, I&#039;m not sure this explanation would fly at the local pizza shop here, but it&#039;s worth a shot, I suppose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, I&#8217;m not sure this explanation would fly at the local pizza shop here, but it&#8217;s worth a shot, I suppose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.337 seconds -->

