<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dating medieval manuscripts via DNA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2009/01/15/dating-medieval-manuscripts-via-dna/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2009/01/15/dating-medieval-manuscripts-via-dna/</link>
	<description>The blog of John D. Cook</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:42:11 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2009/01/15/dating-medieval-manuscripts-via-dna/comment-page-1/#comment-12103</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 23:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=1279#comment-12103</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right. I&#039;m so used to equating &quot;pages&quot; and &quot;paper&quot; that I wrote the latter when I meant the former. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right. I&#8217;m so used to equating &#8220;pages&#8221; and &#8220;paper&#8221; that I wrote the latter when I meant the former. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Venier</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2009/01/15/dating-medieval-manuscripts-via-dna/comment-page-1/#comment-12095</link>
		<dc:creator>John Venier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 20:07:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=1279#comment-12095</guid>
		<description>You mean parchment or vellum, right?  If so there may well be a good chance since I imagine they were made from nearby flocks.

I&#039;ve heard grass pollen can survive with the DNA intact for incredibly long times, even in some kinds of fossils.  A professor I knew speculated that this may well confound genetic analysis of ancient materials, but in the case of processed skin I think you ought to be able to clean off any contaminants really well.

Of course, even if you can date the origin of the material there is still room for confusion because of the practice of using palimpsests.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You mean parchment or vellum, right?  If so there may well be a good chance since I imagine they were made from nearby flocks.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve heard grass pollen can survive with the DNA intact for incredibly long times, even in some kinds of fossils.  A professor I knew speculated that this may well confound genetic analysis of ancient materials, but in the case of processed skin I think you ought to be able to clean off any contaminants really well.</p>
<p>Of course, even if you can date the origin of the material there is still room for confusion because of the practice of using palimpsests.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.303 seconds -->

