<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don&#8217;t try to be God, try to be Shakespeare</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2009/02/12/originality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2009/02/12/originality/</link>
	<description>The blog of John D. Cook</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 01:10:06 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Have you saved a milliwatt today? &#8212; The Endeavour</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2009/02/12/originality/comment-page-1/#comment-87583</link>
		<dc:creator>Have you saved a milliwatt today? &#8212; The Endeavour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 14:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=1501#comment-87583</guid>
		<description>[...] Don&#8217;t try to be God, try to be Shakespeare    ? X [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Don&#8217;t try to be God, try to be Shakespeare    ? X [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deconstructing Thomas Edison &#8212; The Endeavour</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2009/02/12/originality/comment-page-1/#comment-37712</link>
		<dc:creator>Deconstructing Thomas Edison &#8212; The Endeavour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 18:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=1501#comment-37712</guid>
		<description>[...] Don&#8217;t try to be God, try to be Shakespeare Variations on a theme of Newton Thomas Edison&#8217;s fire    ? X [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Don&#8217;t try to be God, try to be Shakespeare Variations on a theme of Newton Thomas Edison&#8217;s fire    ? X [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil H</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2009/02/12/originality/comment-page-1/#comment-28394</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 22:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=1501#comment-28394</guid>
		<description>Bill the Lizard said: &quot;Good advice. I often find myself paralyzed by the fact that everything I want to write has already been written in one form or another.&quot;

The point of art is not to say some new, profound thing. No, art is self-expression, so the purpose of your art is to express *you*. So stop trying to make a great thing, only make something that tells your story from your perspective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill the Lizard said: &#8220;Good advice. I often find myself paralyzed by the fact that everything I want to write has already been written in one form or another.&#8221;</p>
<p>The point of art is not to say some new, profound thing. No, art is self-expression, so the purpose of your art is to express *you*. So stop trying to make a great thing, only make something that tells your story from your perspective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2009/02/12/originality/comment-page-1/#comment-16705</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:19:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=1501#comment-16705</guid>
		<description>Thanks. I fixed the typo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks. I fixed the typo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Venier</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2009/02/12/originality/comment-page-1/#comment-13600</link>
		<dc:creator>John Venier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 18:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=1501#comment-13600</guid>
		<description>Bill,

Mark Twain is good sounding.  Deep enough, but not unfathomable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill,</p>
<p>Mark Twain is good sounding.  Deep enough, but not unfathomable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill the Lizard</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2009/02/12/originality/comment-page-1/#comment-13421</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill the Lizard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 18:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=1501#comment-13421</guid>
		<description>Good advice.  I often find myself paralyzed by the fact that everything I want to write has already been written in one form or another.

On the debate between Chaucer and Shakespeare, I would comfortably settle for being a Mark Twain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good advice.  I often find myself paralyzed by the fact that everything I want to write has already been written in one form or another.</p>
<p>On the debate between Chaucer and Shakespeare, I would comfortably settle for being a Mark Twain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reza</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2009/02/12/originality/comment-page-1/#comment-13269</link>
		<dc:creator>Reza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 05:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=1501#comment-13269</guid>
		<description>And, how different we can be from &quot;Shakespeare&quot;? I think that this is the problem, as I have myself. Not to be God, it is unreliable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And, how different we can be from &#8220;Shakespeare&#8221;? I think that this is the problem, as I have myself. Not to be God, it is unreliable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Venier</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2009/02/12/originality/comment-page-1/#comment-13265</link>
		<dc:creator>John Venier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 02:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=1501#comment-13265</guid>
		<description>John -- You made a couple of typos.  &quot;Homer or Shakespeare&quot; should read &quot;Homer Simpson&quot;.  You&#039;re welcome!

Corwin -- You&#039;re just jealous that you didn&#039;t create it &lt;em&gt;ex nihilo&lt;/em&gt; first.

Gene -- I never read much Chaucer, but I heard some rumors about the Miller&#039;s Tale.  Certainly colorful if true!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John &#8212; You made a couple of typos.  &#8220;Homer or Shakespeare&#8221; should read &#8220;Homer Simpson&#8221;.  You&#8217;re welcome!</p>
<p>Corwin &#8212; You&#8217;re just jealous that you didn&#8217;t create it <em>ex nihilo</em> first.</p>
<p>Gene &#8212; I never read much Chaucer, but I heard some rumors about the Miller&#8217;s Tale.  Certainly colorful if true!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gene</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2009/02/12/originality/comment-page-1/#comment-13264</link>
		<dc:creator>Gene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 01:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=1501#comment-13264</guid>
		<description>I think it would be more fun to be Geoff Chaucer than Shakespeare, perhaps? At least my dim memory of Canterbury Tales and Everyman make me think it is so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it would be more fun to be Geoff Chaucer than Shakespeare, perhaps? At least my dim memory of Canterbury Tales and Everyman make me think it is so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corwin Joy</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2009/02/12/originality/comment-page-1/#comment-13258</link>
		<dc:creator>Corwin Joy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 22:59:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=1501#comment-13258</guid>
		<description>Not a very original quote.  Haven&#039;t I seen that somewhere before?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not a very original quote.  Haven&#8217;t I seen that somewhere before?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Lemire</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2009/02/12/originality/comment-page-1/#comment-13256</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Lemire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 22:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=1501#comment-13256</guid>
		<description>Great quote.

I agree. See one of my blog posts on this topic:

We never invent anything new, yet progress is made!
http://www.daniel-lemire.com/blog/archives/2008/12/27/we-never-invent-anything-new-yet-progress-is-made/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great quote.</p>
<p>I agree. See one of my blog posts on this topic:</p>
<p>We never invent anything new, yet progress is made!<br />
<a href="http://www.daniel-lemire.com/blog/archives/2008/12/27/we-never-invent-anything-new-yet-progress-is-made/" rel="nofollow">http://www.daniel-lemire.com/blog/archives/2008/12/27/we-never-invent-anything-new-yet-progress-is-made/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.395 seconds -->

