<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Strategy for dealing with information overload</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2009/02/24/the-solution-to-information-overload/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2009/02/24/the-solution-to-information-overload/</link>
	<description>The blog of John D. Cook</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:42:11 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jaidev Deshpande</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2009/02/24/the-solution-to-information-overload/comment-page-1/#comment-128001</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaidev Deshpande</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 15:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=1609#comment-128001</guid>
		<description>Shirky definitely enables us to think of information overload in simpler terms, but is that really a solution? This strikes me as a reductionism of sorts. In other words - to what extent can the information overload problem be addressed simply through better filtering? 

Not that thinking about it as a filtering problem isn&#039;t a greatly satisfying approach. But then again, to what extent? Any ideas about how to cope with the sheer &#039;singularity&#039; of the information?

Very interesting post, nevertheless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shirky definitely enables us to think of information overload in simpler terms, but is that really a solution? This strikes me as a reductionism of sorts. In other words &#8211; to what extent can the information overload problem be addressed simply through better filtering? </p>
<p>Not that thinking about it as a filtering problem isn&#8217;t a greatly satisfying approach. But then again, to what extent? Any ideas about how to cope with the sheer &#8217;singularity&#8217; of the information?</p>
<p>Very interesting post, nevertheless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mohammad Elsheimy</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2009/02/24/the-solution-to-information-overload/comment-page-1/#comment-55685</link>
		<dc:creator>Mohammad Elsheimy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 19:20:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=1609#comment-55685</guid>
		<description>You made me rethink about my study. I&#039;m getting too much information, but actually it&#039;s not that! I just want to learn everything in this world, therefore, I can&#039;t focus in anything! This is too bad especially if you don&#039;t have that one who guide you to the right way, you actually spend a very long time in useless things, and after a while, you begin to realize that all of this was, .... nothing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You made me rethink about my study. I&#8217;m getting too much information, but actually it&#8217;s not that! I just want to learn everything in this world, therefore, I can&#8217;t focus in anything! This is too bad especially if you don&#8217;t have that one who guide you to the right way, you actually spend a very long time in useless things, and after a while, you begin to realize that all of this was, &#8230;. nothing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2009/02/24/the-solution-to-information-overload/comment-page-1/#comment-14041</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 12:02:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=1609#comment-14041</guid>
		<description>A related issue is filter trust. If you&#039;ve got a filter but keep checking up on it to evaluate how well it&#039;s doing, the filter isn&#039;t going to help your sense of overload very much. At some point you have to accept your filter&#039;s error rate in order to let it reduce your overload.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A related issue is filter trust. If you&#8217;ve got a filter but keep checking up on it to evaluate how well it&#8217;s doing, the filter isn&#8217;t going to help your sense of overload very much. At some point you have to accept your filter&#8217;s error rate in order to let it reduce your overload.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zac</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2009/02/24/the-solution-to-information-overload/comment-page-1/#comment-13839</link>
		<dc:creator>Zac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 02:31:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=1609#comment-13839</guid>
		<description>Hi John

In Timothy Ferriss&#039;s &lt;i&gt;4 Hour Work Week&lt;/i&gt;, he makes many good points about filters.

For example, do we &lt;i&gt;really&lt;/i&gt; need to obsess as much as we do over the news? Some people spend hours glued to CNN when something is &quot;breaking news&quot;, then they watch the re-runs, the analysis and then the weekly summary.

Ferriss is extreme - he doesn&#039;t watch or read any news. He figures if anything is really important, people will be talking about it. (Too extreme for me, but interesting to consider.)

I find that the filters in gMail really help me with overload. For the stuff that&#039;s not really important, out of site/out of mind is bliss.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi John</p>
<p>In Timothy Ferriss&#8217;s <i>4 Hour Work Week</i>, he makes many good points about filters.</p>
<p>For example, do we <i>really</i> need to obsess as much as we do over the news? Some people spend hours glued to CNN when something is &#8220;breaking news&#8221;, then they watch the re-runs, the analysis and then the weekly summary.</p>
<p>Ferriss is extreme &#8211; he doesn&#8217;t watch or read any news. He figures if anything is really important, people will be talking about it. (Too extreme for me, but interesting to consider.)</p>
<p>I find that the filters in gMail really help me with overload. For the stuff that&#8217;s not really important, out of site/out of mind is bliss.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Swanson</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2009/02/24/the-solution-to-information-overload/comment-page-1/#comment-13756</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Swanson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=1609#comment-13756</guid>
		<description>great non-reactive, thoughtful corrective. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great non-reactive, thoughtful corrective. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.337 seconds -->

