<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Three rules of thumb</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2009/07/01/three-rules-of-thumb/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2009/07/01/three-rules-of-thumb/</link>
	<description>The blog of John D. Cook</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 01:10:06 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nick Brown</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2009/07/01/three-rules-of-thumb/comment-page-1/#comment-128052</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 18:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=2550#comment-128052</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s funny that both the speed of sound and speed of light can be so readily approximated by &quot;1 foot per x&quot; - 1 foot per millisecond is a very common rule of thumb in acoustics, sound recording (microphone arrays) and live sound (speaker arrays).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s funny that both the speed of sound and speed of light can be so readily approximated by &#8220;1 foot per x&#8221; &#8211; 1 foot per millisecond is a very common rule of thumb in acoustics, sound recording (microphone arrays) and live sound (speaker arrays).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Bradley</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2009/07/01/three-rules-of-thumb/comment-page-1/#comment-128036</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 17:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=2550#comment-128036</guid>
		<description>I just saw this page in a tweet from @CompSciFact
The video has been taken down, but a quick search brings up another copy:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RZ0g5_NgRao</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just saw this page in a tweet from @CompSciFact<br />
The video has been taken down, but a quick search brings up another copy:<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RZ0g5_NgRao" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RZ0g5_NgRao</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fernando</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2009/07/01/three-rules-of-thumb/comment-page-1/#comment-128035</link>
		<dc:creator>fernando</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 17:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=2550#comment-128035</guid>
		<description>the  video is not available anymore, its account has been removed due to copyright issues :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the  video is not available anymore, its account has been removed due to copyright issues <img src='http://www.johndcook.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pi seconds equals one nanocentury &#8212; The Endeavour</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2009/07/01/three-rules-of-thumb/comment-page-1/#comment-48535</link>
		<dc:creator>Pi seconds equals one nanocentury &#8212; The Endeavour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 12:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=2550#comment-48535</guid>
		<description>[...] wrote briefly about Duff&#8217;s rule a while back in the post Three rules of thumb. That post also includes a great video of Grace Hopper explaining to David Letterman her rule of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] wrote briefly about Duff&#8217;s rule a while back in the post Three rules of thumb. That post also includes a great video of Grace Hopper explaining to David Letterman her rule of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: harrywwc</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2009/07/01/three-rules-of-thumb/comment-page-1/#comment-45790</link>
		<dc:creator>harrywwc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 10:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=2550#comment-45790</guid>
		<description>I know it&#039;s &quot;late&quot;, but I suspect that Grace&#039;s &quot;nano-second&quot; was actually 30cm long (0.3m) , rather than 12inches. There is a slight difference ;&#039;) in which case, her nano-second is (by my reckoning) about 1/3 of 1% &#039;off&#039;.
My reasoning is that she was a Scientist, and she would have been familiar with the MKS (meters / kilograms / seconds) system. Indeed, the wikipedia article seems to back up this inference that she used 30cm (11.8in) rather than 1foot.
great site,
.h</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know it&#8217;s &#8220;late&#8221;, but I suspect that Grace&#8217;s &#8220;nano-second&#8221; was actually 30cm long (0.3m) , rather than 12inches. There is a slight difference ;&#8217;) in which case, her nano-second is (by my reckoning) about 1/3 of 1% &#8216;off&#8217;.<br />
My reasoning is that she was a Scientist, and she would have been familiar with the MKS (meters / kilograms / seconds) system. Indeed, the wikipedia article seems to back up this inference that she used 30cm (11.8in) rather than 1foot.<br />
great site,<br />
.h</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jared Updike</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2009/07/01/three-rules-of-thumb/comment-page-1/#comment-20389</link>
		<dc:creator>Jared Updike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 20:56:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=2550#comment-20389</guid>
		<description>Thanks Bill for sharing that video, and John for adding the link. Made my day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Bill for sharing that video, and John for adding the link. Made my day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Regan</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2009/07/01/three-rules-of-thumb/comment-page-1/#comment-20382</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Regan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 18:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=2550#comment-20382</guid>
		<description>Re: the video (at about 7:55): A picosecond is a trillionth, not quadrillionth of a second.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: the video (at about 7:55): A picosecond is a trillionth, not quadrillionth of a second.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2009/07/01/three-rules-of-thumb/comment-page-1/#comment-20375</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 14:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=2550#comment-20375</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Bill. I updated the post to include the interview you pointed out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Bill. I updated the post to include the interview you pointed out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill the Lizard</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2009/07/01/three-rules-of-thumb/comment-page-1/#comment-20373</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill the Lizard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 14:16:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=2550#comment-20373</guid>
		<description>Grace Hopper gave a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=57bfxsiVTd4&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;fun interview&lt;/a&gt; back in the early 1980&#039;s on David Letterman.  She explains Hopper&#039;s rule, and even takes it a step further and shows Dave what a picosecond looks like.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grace Hopper gave a <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=57bfxsiVTd4" rel="nofollow">fun interview</a> back in the early 1980&#8217;s on David Letterman.  She explains Hopper&#8217;s rule, and even takes it a step further and shows Dave what a picosecond looks like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.345 seconds -->

