<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Inverse Mercator projection</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2009/09/21/gudermannian/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2009/09/21/gudermannian/</link>
	<description>The blog of John D. Cook</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 01:10:06 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Poor Mercator &#8212; The Endeavour</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2009/09/21/gudermannian/comment-page-1/#comment-114782</link>
		<dc:creator>Poor Mercator &#8212; The Endeavour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 17:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=3226#comment-114782</guid>
		<description>[...] The inverse of the Mercator projection, going from maps onto the globe, is more interesting. Aside from its geographical importance, it gives a way of relating circular and hyperbolic functions without using complex numbers. More details here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The inverse of the Mercator projection, going from maps onto the globe, is more interesting. Aside from its geographical importance, it gives a way of relating circular and hyperbolic functions without using complex numbers. More details here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Journey away from the center of the Earth &#8212; The Endeavour</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2009/09/21/gudermannian/comment-page-1/#comment-103686</link>
		<dc:creator>Journey away from the center of the Earth &#8212; The Endeavour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 13:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=3226#comment-103686</guid>
		<description>[...] is the shape of the Earth? Finding distances from coordinates Mercator projection Inverse Mercator projection    ? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is the shape of the Earth? Finding distances from coordinates Mercator projection Inverse Mercator projection    ? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2009/09/21/gudermannian/comment-page-1/#comment-41778</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 19:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=3226#comment-41778</guid>
		<description>Spivak&#039;s book is one of my favorites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spivak&#8217;s book is one of my favorites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2009/09/21/gudermannian/comment-page-1/#comment-41777</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 19:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=3226#comment-41777</guid>
		<description>The gudermanian has another property: its derivative is the secant. That&#039;s no surprise if you know the inverse function theorem, but there&#039;s a nice footnote to this (from Spivak&#039;s &quot;Calculus&quot;, second edition, page 383, problem 19.12), which kind of amplifies what your earlier posting said:

&quot;There is another expression for [the integral of secant], which is ... log(tan(x/2 + pi/4)). This last expression was actually the first one discovered, and was due, not to any mathematician&#039;s cleverness, but to a curious historical accident: In 1599 Wright computed nautical tables that amounted to definite integrals of sec. When the first tables for the logarithms of tangents were produced, the correspondence between the two tables was immediately noticed ( but remained unexplained until the invention of calculus). &quot;

[If your (I&#039;m speaking to everyone here) calculus book didn&#039;t have cool things in it like this, you should pick up a copy of Spivak&#039;s book!]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The gudermanian has another property: its derivative is the secant. That&#8217;s no surprise if you know the inverse function theorem, but there&#8217;s a nice footnote to this (from Spivak&#8217;s &#8220;Calculus&#8221;, second edition, page 383, problem 19.12), which kind of amplifies what your earlier posting said:</p>
<p>&#8220;There is another expression for [the integral of secant], which is &#8230; log(tan(x/2 + pi/4)). This last expression was actually the first one discovered, and was due, not to any mathematician&#8217;s cleverness, but to a curious historical accident: In 1599 Wright computed nautical tables that amounted to definite integrals of sec. When the first tables for the logarithms of tangents were produced, the correspondence between the two tables was immediately noticed ( but remained unexplained until the invention of calculus). &#8221;</p>
<p>[If your (I'm speaking to everyone here) calculus book didn't have cool things in it like this, you should pick up a copy of Spivak's book!]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walking Randomly &#187; Carnival of Maths #58</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2009/09/21/gudermannian/comment-page-1/#comment-27114</link>
		<dc:creator>Walking Randomly &#187; Carnival of Maths #58</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 11:29:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=3226#comment-27114</guid>
		<description>[...] Moving over to The Endeavour, we have two related submissions from John D Cook all about The Mercator Projection and its inverse. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Moving over to The Endeavour, we have two related submissions from John D Cook all about The Mercator Projection and its inverse. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.310 seconds -->

