<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How many trig functions are there?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2009/09/25/how-many-trig-functions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2009/09/25/how-many-trig-functions/</link>
	<description>The blog of John D. Cook</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 05:39:36 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Armstrong</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2009/09/25/how-many-trig-functions/comment-page-1/#comment-32371</link>
		<dc:creator>John Armstrong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 19:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=3211#comment-32371</guid>
		<description>2) Sine and Cosine may be related as you indicate, but they&#039;re a very important pair.  Specifically, they provide an orthogonal basis for the space of solutions to the differential equation

$latex \displaystyle\frac{d^2}{dt^2}u(t)+u(t)=0$</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2) Sine and Cosine may be related as you indicate, but they&#8217;re a very important pair.  Specifically, they provide an orthogonal basis for the space of solutions to the differential equation</p>
<p>$latex \displaystyle\frac{d^2}{dt^2}u(t)+u(t)=0$</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wing</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2009/09/25/how-many-trig-functions/comment-page-1/#comment-25257</link>
		<dc:creator>Wing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 01:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=3211#comment-25257</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the article. I just read the Wikipedia articles on versine, haversine, etc. and it&#039;s pretty awesome. It&#039;s sad that there&#039;s really no way to actually learn spherical trig anymore in school.

As to why a calc text claims that there are 6 trig functions: a lot of formulas can be expressed more nicely with sec, cos and cot. The derivative of tan is for example secant squared. Also, the 1 + tan^2 =sec^2 identity plays a crucial role in some integrals.

I guess you have as many trig functions as you need. In most cases, it would probably be 0.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the article. I just read the Wikipedia articles on versine, haversine, etc. and it&#8217;s pretty awesome. It&#8217;s sad that there&#8217;s really no way to actually learn spherical trig anymore in school.</p>
<p>As to why a calc text claims that there are 6 trig functions: a lot of formulas can be expressed more nicely with sec, cos and cot. The derivative of tan is for example secant squared. Also, the 1 + tan^2 =sec^2 identity plays a crucial role in some integrals.</p>
<p>I guess you have as many trig functions as you need. In most cases, it would probably be 0.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sue VanHattum</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2009/09/25/how-many-trig-functions/comment-page-1/#comment-25152</link>
		<dc:creator>Sue VanHattum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 23:15:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=3211#comment-25152</guid>
		<description>Thank you! One of the texts I&#039;ve used said something about the most common 6 trig functions, and I was bewildered. I had never gotten around to researching this, so I&#039;m delighted to have it drop into my lap today. Now I know. 6 more antiques to think on, if you wish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you! One of the texts I&#8217;ve used said something about the most common 6 trig functions, and I was bewildered. I had never gotten around to researching this, so I&#8217;m delighted to have it drop into my lap today. Now I know. 6 more antiques to think on, if you wish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2009/09/25/how-many-trig-functions/comment-page-1/#comment-25113</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 02:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=3211#comment-25113</guid>
		<description>I can see the argument for there being no trig functions - and revert back to e and i, but of course these are only elements in a field, not functions in of themselves.  The &#039;fundamental&#039; function relating e, i, and sines and cosines is of course the exponential function.  For this matter, we can actually just return to sums and products and toss in the weird operation of &#039;infinite&#039; sums of products; or perhaps the &#039;limit&#039; of an infinite sequence of partial sums is even more basic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can see the argument for there being no trig functions &#8211; and revert back to e and i, but of course these are only elements in a field, not functions in of themselves.  The &#8216;fundamental&#8217; function relating e, i, and sines and cosines is of course the exponential function.  For this matter, we can actually just return to sums and products and toss in the weird operation of &#8216;infinite&#8217; sums of products; or perhaps the &#8216;limit&#8217; of an infinite sequence of partial sums is even more basic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Durst</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2009/09/25/how-many-trig-functions/comment-page-1/#comment-25100</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Durst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 21:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=3211#comment-25100</guid>
		<description>Am now trying to think whether the co- in cosine can be expressed as a special case of the co- in everything else (cohomology, cobordism, etc.)

I&#039;m told that at Mathcamp last year, two individuals agreed to share the job of coordinator.  So they were, of course, called the ordinators.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am now trying to think whether the co- in cosine can be expressed as a special case of the co- in everything else (cohomology, cobordism, etc.)</p>
<p>I&#8217;m told that at Mathcamp last year, two individuals agreed to share the job of coordinator.  So they were, of course, called the ordinators.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: josh reich</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2009/09/25/how-many-trig-functions/comment-page-1/#comment-25094</link>
		<dc:creator>josh reich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 19:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=3211#comment-25094</guid>
		<description>There are no trig functions, only e and i.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are no trig functions, only e and i.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
