<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Circle of fifths and roots of two</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2009/09/30/perfect-fifths-equal-temperament/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2009/09/30/perfect-fifths-equal-temperament/</link>
	<description>The blog of John D. Cook</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 03:02:57 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2009/09/30/perfect-fifths-equal-temperament/comment-page-1/#comment-25345</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 22:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=3236#comment-25345</guid>
		<description>Thanks to J.S. Bach for making the case for equal temperament!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to J.S. Bach for making the case for equal temperament!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Black</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2009/09/30/perfect-fifths-equal-temperament/comment-page-1/#comment-25344</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Black</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 22:14:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=3236#comment-25344</guid>
		<description>Great timing, too.  A relatively recent Nova ScienceNow podcast covered musical autotuning, being put to great (ab)use in the last decade not only to ameliorate poor talent, but to hide it completely behind trendy distortion patterns.  Of course, the story&#039;s not too deep, but I have to imagine that in addition to some FFT or such, this sort of math has to come into play.

I&#039;m happy to be disabused of this notion, say, by a post on The Endeavor?  +)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great timing, too.  A relatively recent Nova ScienceNow podcast covered musical autotuning, being put to great (ab)use in the last decade not only to ameliorate poor talent, but to hide it completely behind trendy distortion patterns.  Of course, the story&#8217;s not too deep, but I have to imagine that in addition to some FFT or such, this sort of math has to come into play.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m happy to be disabused of this notion, say, by a post on The Endeavor?  +)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Fitzgerald</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2009/09/30/perfect-fifths-equal-temperament/comment-page-1/#comment-25329</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Fitzgerald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 14:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=3236#comment-25329</guid>
		<description>John,

This is the cleanest description of the difference between Pythagorean tuning and equal temperament I&#039;ve read, from a mathematical perspective, in any case.

Will</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John,</p>
<p>This is the cleanest description of the difference between Pythagorean tuning and equal temperament I&#8217;ve read, from a mathematical perspective, in any case.</p>
<p>Will</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
