<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Circle of fifths and roots of two</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2009/09/30/perfect-fifths-equal-temperament/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2009/09/30/perfect-fifths-equal-temperament/</link>
	<description>The blog of John D. Cook</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:42:11 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Schneider</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2009/09/30/perfect-fifths-equal-temperament/comment-page-1/#comment-80539</link>
		<dc:creator>Schneider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 12:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=3236#comment-80539</guid>
		<description>The easiest, the shiniest and the most fantastic way to describe how different the two kinds of tuning are :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The easiest, the shiniest and the most fantastic way to describe how different the two kinds of tuning are <img src='http://www.johndcook.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: On &#8220;temperament&#8221; &#171; blog of the green squirrel</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2009/09/30/perfect-fifths-equal-temperament/comment-page-1/#comment-37160</link>
		<dc:creator>On &#8220;temperament&#8221; &#171; blog of the green squirrel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 02:25:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=3236#comment-37160</guid>
		<description>[...] For a more mathematical look at why the issue of musical temperament arises, this is a good reference &#8211; Circle of fifths and roots of two. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] For a more mathematical look at why the issue of musical temperament arises, this is a good reference &#8211; Circle of fifths and roots of two. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the_green_squirrel</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2009/09/30/perfect-fifths-equal-temperament/comment-page-1/#comment-36721</link>
		<dc:creator>the_green_squirrel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 15:39:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=3236#comment-36721</guid>
		<description>@cogito: http://lmgtfy.com/?q=440+hz&amp;l=1

@Bruce: I know very little but this area, but I was under the impression that Bach favored a well temperament system, distinct from equal temperament.  I just read an interesting article on the subject - The centuries-old struggle to play in tune - http://www.slate.com/id/2250793/pagenum/all/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@cogito: <a href="http://lmgtfy.com/?q=440+hz&amp;l=1" rel="nofollow">http://lmgtfy.com/?q=440+hz&amp;l=1</a></p>
<p>@Bruce: I know very little but this area, but I was under the impression that Bach favored a well temperament system, distinct from equal temperament.  I just read an interesting article on the subject &#8211; The centuries-old struggle to play in tune &#8211; <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2250793/pagenum/all/" rel="nofollow">http://www.slate.com/id/2250793/pagenum/all/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CogitoErgoCogitoSum</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2009/09/30/perfect-fifths-equal-temperament/comment-page-1/#comment-36480</link>
		<dc:creator>CogitoErgoCogitoSum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 09:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=3236#comment-36480</guid>
		<description>I have seen at least three different internet sites that explained 440 Hz was the piano&#039;s Middle C.  This is the first I have seen of 440 Hz being an A.  I havent studied much in the way of music theory, and Im not accusing you of being wrong, but I recommend checking your sources on that because you are the first inconsistency I have seen in four.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have seen at least three different internet sites that explained 440 Hz was the piano&#8217;s Middle C.  This is the first I have seen of 440 Hz being an A.  I havent studied much in the way of music theory, and Im not accusing you of being wrong, but I recommend checking your sources on that because you are the first inconsistency I have seen in four.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2009/09/30/perfect-fifths-equal-temperament/comment-page-1/#comment-25345</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 22:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=3236#comment-25345</guid>
		<description>Thanks to J.S. Bach for making the case for equal temperament!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to J.S. Bach for making the case for equal temperament!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Black</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2009/09/30/perfect-fifths-equal-temperament/comment-page-1/#comment-25344</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Black</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 22:14:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=3236#comment-25344</guid>
		<description>Great timing, too.  A relatively recent Nova ScienceNow podcast covered musical autotuning, being put to great (ab)use in the last decade not only to ameliorate poor talent, but to hide it completely behind trendy distortion patterns.  Of course, the story&#039;s not too deep, but I have to imagine that in addition to some FFT or such, this sort of math has to come into play.

I&#039;m happy to be disabused of this notion, say, by a post on The Endeavor?  +)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great timing, too.  A relatively recent Nova ScienceNow podcast covered musical autotuning, being put to great (ab)use in the last decade not only to ameliorate poor talent, but to hide it completely behind trendy distortion patterns.  Of course, the story&#8217;s not too deep, but I have to imagine that in addition to some FFT or such, this sort of math has to come into play.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m happy to be disabused of this notion, say, by a post on The Endeavor?  +)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Fitzgerald</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2009/09/30/perfect-fifths-equal-temperament/comment-page-1/#comment-25329</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Fitzgerald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 14:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=3236#comment-25329</guid>
		<description>John,

This is the cleanest description of the difference between Pythagorean tuning and equal temperament I&#039;ve read, from a mathematical perspective, in any case.

Will</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John,</p>
<p>This is the cleanest description of the difference between Pythagorean tuning and equal temperament I&#8217;ve read, from a mathematical perspective, in any case.</p>
<p>Will</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.321 seconds -->

