<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Manage your project portfolio</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2009/11/03/manage-your-project-portfolio/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2009/11/03/manage-your-project-portfolio/</link>
	<description>The blog of John D. Cook</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 01:10:06 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John MacIntyre</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2009/11/03/manage-your-project-portfolio/comment-page-1/#comment-68486</link>
		<dc:creator>John MacIntyre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 15:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=3592#comment-68486</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the book suggestion.  Managing multiple projects is definitely a dynamic which hasn&#039;t been covered very much, but is a reality especially with consulting.  Project management tools wouldn&#039;t do badly by adopting this perspective as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the book suggestion.  Managing multiple projects is definitely a dynamic which hasn&#8217;t been covered very much, but is a reality especially with consulting.  Project management tools wouldn&#8217;t do badly by adopting this perspective as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2009/11/03/manage-your-project-portfolio/comment-page-1/#comment-27406</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 19:04:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=3592#comment-27406</guid>
		<description>Good question. The book was written with software projects in mind, but I&#039;d say most of the principles in the book apply to project management in general.

One of Gerald Weinberg&#039;s rules is &quot;it&#039;s always a people problem,&quot; even if it looks like a technical problem. And this book deals with people problems: managing expectations, political problems, how to say &quot;no,&quot; etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good question. The book was written with software projects in mind, but I&#8217;d say most of the principles in the book apply to project management in general.</p>
<p>One of Gerald Weinberg&#8217;s rules is &#8220;it&#8217;s always a people problem,&#8221; even if it looks like a technical problem. And this book deals with people problems: managing expectations, political problems, how to say &#8220;no,&#8221; etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2009/11/03/manage-your-project-portfolio/comment-page-1/#comment-27405</link>
		<dc:creator>John Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 18:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=3592#comment-27405</guid>
		<description>How generalizable are the ideas in this book? I noticed it was part of the pragmatic programmer series, and I was wondering whether most of the principles would apply to any sort of organization structured into projects, or whether most of the principles apply mainly to programming/software development.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How generalizable are the ideas in this book? I noticed it was part of the pragmatic programmer series, and I was wondering whether most of the principles would apply to any sort of organization structured into projects, or whether most of the principles apply mainly to programming/software development.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.321 seconds -->

