<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Economizing approximations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2010/02/18/economizing-approximations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2010/02/18/economizing-approximations/</link>
	<description>The blog of John D. Cook</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 01:10:06 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2010/02/18/economizing-approximations/comment-page-1/#comment-107712</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 20:07:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=4600#comment-107712</guid>
		<description>The factored approach to polynomial evaluation is known as Horner&#039;s Method. It may be fewer operations than the naive approach, but that&#039;s misleading if you&#039;re not computing by hand. On modern computers, flops are free. You actually want to optimize for the shallowest expression, which runs directly counter to what Horner&#039;s method does.

I have a benchmark for a few different methods available in git://charm.cs.illinois.edu/users/phil/polyeval.git constructed when the professor in my Numerical Analysis class described Horner&#039;s Method in the same misleading terms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The factored approach to polynomial evaluation is known as Horner&#8217;s Method. It may be fewer operations than the naive approach, but that&#8217;s misleading if you&#8217;re not computing by hand. On modern computers, flops are free. You actually want to optimize for the shallowest expression, which runs directly counter to what Horner&#8217;s method does.</p>
<p>I have a benchmark for a few different methods available in git://charm.cs.illinois.edu/users/phil/polyeval.git constructed when the professor in my Numerical Analysis class described Horner&#8217;s Method in the same misleading terms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.289 seconds -->

