<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rewarding complexity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2010/04/05/rewarding-complexity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2010/04/05/rewarding-complexity/</link>
	<description>The blog of John D. Cook</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 01:10:06 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Advantages of crude models &#8212; The Endeavour</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2010/04/05/rewarding-complexity/comment-page-1/#comment-133056</link>
		<dc:creator>Advantages of crude models &#8212; The Endeavour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 13:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=4999#comment-133056</guid>
		<description>[...] model is worthwhile before I invest too much effort in it. And I&#8217;m well aware of forces that reward complexity for its own [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] model is worthwhile before I invest too much effort in it. And I&#8217;m well aware of forces that reward complexity for its own [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2010/04/05/rewarding-complexity/comment-page-1/#comment-121057</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 13:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=4999#comment-121057</guid>
		<description>Somewhere along the line Windows did cut out some code. They did a thorough security review and along the way found some code was unnecessary. I forget when that was. And there may have been more recent efforts that I haven&#039;t heard of.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somewhere along the line Windows did cut out some code. They did a thorough security review and along the way found some code was unnecessary. I forget when that was. And there may have been more recent efforts that I haven&#8217;t heard of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: human mathematics</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2010/04/05/rewarding-complexity/comment-page-1/#comment-120960</link>
		<dc:creator>human mathematics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 05:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=4999#comment-120960</guid>
		<description>I am not an expert but I thought Windows&#039; bloat was just a matter of expediency rather than purposeful choice. I thought I&#039;d read that since XP at least it was a goal of MS to shrink the codebase down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not an expert but I thought Windows&#8217; bloat was just a matter of expediency rather than purposeful choice. I thought I&#8217;d read that since XP at least it was a goal of MS to shrink the codebase down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stupidity scales &#8212; The Endeavour</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2010/04/05/rewarding-complexity/comment-page-1/#comment-92942</link>
		<dc:creator>Stupidity scales &#8212; The Endeavour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 14:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=4999#comment-92942</guid>
		<description>[...] scar tissue Rewarding complexity What&#8217;s wrong with paper?    ? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] scar tissue Rewarding complexity What&#8217;s wrong with paper?    ? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Forced to be simple &#8212; The Endeavour</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2010/04/05/rewarding-complexity/comment-page-1/#comment-74977</link>
		<dc:creator>Forced to be simple &#8212; The Endeavour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 14:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=4999#comment-74977</guid>
		<description>[...] familiar with simple Rewarding complexity A little simplicity goes a long way    ? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] familiar with simple Rewarding complexity A little simplicity goes a long way    ? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2010/04/05/rewarding-complexity/comment-page-1/#comment-36243</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 05:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=4999#comment-36243</guid>
		<description>He is wrong.
The reason for nation&#039;s collapse is not complexity but sins.
Material oriented minds will not understand that life is a very short period in which we will be judged according to our deeds , 

good deeds = simple happy life , 
bad deeds = complex miserable (collapse) life.

Thanks,
Ahmed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He is wrong.<br />
The reason for nation&#8217;s collapse is not complexity but sins.<br />
Material oriented minds will not understand that life is a very short period in which we will be judged according to our deeds , </p>
<p>good deeds = simple happy life ,<br />
bad deeds = complex miserable (collapse) life.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Ahmed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Lemire</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2010/04/05/rewarding-complexity/comment-page-1/#comment-35898</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Lemire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 03:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=4999#comment-35898</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s certainly true.

What probably hurts is that teaching, blogging and industry consulting are not rewarded in academia. So, people can build nonsense unhindered.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s certainly true.</p>
<p>What probably hurts is that teaching, blogging and industry consulting are not rewarded in academia. So, people can build nonsense unhindered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.467 seconds -->

