Comments on: Undamped forced vibrations http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2013/02/22/undamped-forced-vibrations/ John D. Cook Mon, 20 May 2013 00:28:42 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: Free damped vibrations — The Endeavour http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2013/02/22/undamped-forced-vibrations/comment-page-1/#comment-812 Free damped vibrations — The Endeavour Mon, 04 Mar 2013 16:26:28 +0000 http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=12904#comment-812 [...] two posts in the series will add a forcing term, i.e. F > 0 in our differential equation. The next post will look at undamped driven vibrations, and the final post will look at damped driven [...]

]]> By: John http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2013/02/22/undamped-forced-vibrations/comment-page-1/#comment-811 John Tue, 26 Feb 2013 20:55:34 +0000 http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=12904#comment-811 An agent: Freudian slip on my part? Thanks. Typo fixed.

]]> By: An agent http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2013/02/22/undamped-forced-vibrations/comment-page-1/#comment-810 An agent Tue, 26 Feb 2013 20:07:23 +0000 http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=12904#comment-810 “… you’ll hear a pitch of 440.5 getting louder and software …”

I take it you meant to write “softer”.

Thanks for these posts, by the way. I’m usually more interested in statistics, but this is interesting stuff.

]]> By: Pseudonym http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2013/02/22/undamped-forced-vibrations/comment-page-1/#comment-809 Pseudonym Mon, 25 Feb 2013 01:18:52 +0000 http://www.johndcook.com/blog/?p=12904#comment-809 Would this be a good opportunity to bring up Green’s functions?

]]>