One thing I think deserves more emphasis is that “co” in cosine etc. stands for “complement” as in complementary angles. The cosine of an angle is the sine of the complementary angle. For any function f(x), its complement is the function f(π/2 – x).
When memorizing a table of trig functions and their derivatives, students notice a pattern. You can turn one formula into another by replacing every function with its co-function and adding a negative sign on one side. For example,
(d/dx) tan(x) = sec2(x)
(d/dx) cot(x) = – csc2(x)
In words, the derivative of tangent is secant squared, and the derivative of cotangent is negative cosecant squared.
The explanation of this pattern has nothing to do with trig functions per se. It’s just the chain rule applied to f(π/2 – x).
(d/dx) f(π/2 – x) = – f‘(π/2 – x).
Suppose you have some function banana(x) and its derivative is kiwi(x). Then the cobanana function is banana(π/2 – x), the cokiwi function  is kiwi((π/2 – x), and the derivative of cobanana(x) is –cokiwi(x). In trig-like notation
(d/dx) ban(x) = kiw(x)
(d/dx) cob(x) = – cok(x).
Now what is unique to sines and cosines is that the second derivative gives you the negative of what you started with. That is, the sine and cosine functions satisfy the differential equation y” = –y. That doesn’t necessarily happen with bananas and kiwis. If the derivative of banana is kiwi, that doesn’t imply that the derivative of kiwi is negative banana. If the derivative of kiwi is negative banana, then kiwis and bananas must be linear combinations of sines and cosines because all solutions to y” = –y have the form a sin(x) + b cos(x).
 Authors are divided over whether the cokiwi function should be abbreviated cok or ckw.