[{"id":248186,"date":"2026-11-09T11:01:43","date_gmt":"2026-11-09T17:01:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/?p=248186"},"modified":"2026-11-09T11:10:54","modified_gmt":"2026-11-09T17:10:54","slug":"steiner-systems","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2026\/11\/09\/steiner-systems\/","title":{"rendered":"Steiner Systems"},"content":{"rendered":"<h2>Steiner triples<\/h2>\n<p>Several examples from the recent posts on finite geometry are special cases of Steiner triples.<\/p>\n<p>A Steiner triple system, written STS(<em>n<\/em>), is a set <em>S<\/em> of\u00a0<em>n<\/em> elements and a collection of three-element subsets of\u00a0<em>S<\/em> called blocks, such that every two-element subset of\u00a0<em>S<\/em> belongs to exactly one block.<\/p>\n<p>STS(7) is the smallest finite projective plane, the Fano plane, and STS(9) is the smallest finite affine plane. In both cases you interpret the elements of <em>S<\/em> as points and the blocks as lines.<\/p>\n<p>Several questions come up naturally. First, for which values of\u00a0<em>n<\/em> does an STS(<em>n<\/em>) exist? A necessary and sufficient condition for is that <em>n<\/em> = 1 or 3 mod 6.<\/p>\n<p>For a given\u00a0<em>n<\/em>, can there be more than one STS(<em>n<\/em>), i.e. are there Steiner triple systems of the same size that are not isomorphic? Yes indeed. The number of non-isomorphic instances grows rapidly with\u00a0<em>n<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>When does (some instance of) STS(<em>n<\/em>) correspond to a projective or affine space? When <em>n<\/em> = 2<sup><em>k<\/em><\/sup> \u2212 1 for <em>k<\/em> \u2265 3. For <em>n<\/em> \u2265 13 there are multiple isomorphism classes of STS(<em>n<\/em>), so for <em>k<\/em> &gt; 3 there will be an instance of STS(2<sup><em>k<\/em><\/sup> \u2212 1) that corresponds to a projective space and other instances that do not. The instance that does correspond to a projective plane will be isomorphic to a finite field analog of the real projective plane.<\/p>\n<h2>Steiner systems<\/h2>\n<p>Steiner triple systems are a special case of Steiner systems. A Steiner system\u00a0<em>S<\/em>(<em>t<\/em>,\u00a0<em>k<\/em>,\u00a0<em>n<\/em>) is a set of\u00a0<em>n<\/em> items and a collection of blocks that are\u00a0<em>k<\/em>-element subsets such that every set of\u00a0<em>t<\/em> items belongs to a unique block. Steiner triples are\u00a0<em>S<\/em>(2, 3,\u00a0<em>n<\/em>) systems.<\/p>\n<p>Steiner systems often correspond to finite geometries with the blocks interpreted as lines. As with the special case of triples, there can be non-isomorphic instances of Steiner systems, and so when I say below that\u00a0<em>S<\/em>(<em>t<\/em>, <em>k<\/em>, <em>n<\/em>) corresponds to a certain geometry, I mean that at least one instance corresonds to that geometry.<\/p>\n<h3>Projective<\/h3>\n<p>The Steiner system<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><em>S<\/em>(2,\u00a0<em>q<\/em> + 1, (<em>q<\/em><sup><em>d<\/em> + 1<\/sup> \u2212 1)\/(<em>q<\/em> \u2212 1))<\/p>\n<p>with <em>q<\/em> a prime power greater than 2 is a <em>d<\/em>-dimensional projective space.<\/p>\n<h3>Affine<\/h3>\n<p>The space<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><em>S<\/em>(2, <em>q<\/em>, <em>q<\/em><sup><em>d<\/em><\/sup>)<\/p>\n<p>is an affine space. Again <em>q<\/em> &gt; 2 is a prime power.<\/p>\n<h3>Hyperbolic<\/h3>\n<p>The finite hyperbolic plane given as an example in an earlier post corresponds to <em>S<\/em>(2, 2, 6). Many other Steiner systems are hyperbolic, but I&#8217;m not aware of a tidy classification similar to the ones above.<\/p>\n<h2>Steiner systems outside geometry<\/h2>\n<p>Steiner systems were named after Swiss mathematician Jakob Steiner because he published a highly cited article asking questions about what we now call Steiner triples. His interest in these systems was combinatorial. Others developed the connections to geometry later.<\/p>\n<p>Steiner systems arise in several areas of mathematics outside of geometry, including coding theory, design of experiments, and graph theory.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Steiner triples Several examples from the recent posts on finite geometry are special cases of Steiner triples. A Steiner triple system, written STS(n), is a set S of\u00a0n elements and a collection of three-element subsets of\u00a0S called blocks, such that every two-element subset of\u00a0S belongs to exactly one block. STS(7) is the smallest finite projective [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[197,224],"class_list":["post-248186","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-math","tag-combinatorics","tag-geometry"],"acf":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t<!-- All in One SEO 5.0.5 - aioseo.com -->\n\t<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Steiner systems are combinatorial structures that often have geometrical interpretations. They appear in several areas of mathematics.\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"max-image-preview:large\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"author\" content=\"John\"\/>\n\t<meta name=\"keywords\" content=\"combinatorics,geometry\" \/>\n\t<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2026\/11\/09\/steiner-systems\/\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"generator\" content=\"All in One SEO (AIOSEO) 5.0.5\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"John D. Cook | Applied Mathematics Consulting\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Steiner Systems\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Steiner systems are combinatorial structures that often have geometrical interpretations. They appear in several areas of mathematics.\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2026\/11\/09\/steiner-systems\/\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-11-09T17:01:43+00:00\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-11-09T17:10:54+00:00\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Steiner Systems\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"Steiner systems are combinatorial structures that often have geometrical interpretations. They appear in several areas of mathematics.\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/twittercard.png\" \/>\n\t\t<!-- All in One SEO -->\n\n","aioseo_head_json":{"title":"Steiner Systems","description":"Steiner systems are combinatorial structures that often have geometrical interpretations. They appear in several areas of mathematics.","canonical_url":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2026\/11\/09\/steiner-systems\/","robots":"max-image-preview:large","keywords":"combinatorics,geometry","webmasterTools":{"miscellaneous":""},"schema":null,"og:locale":"en_US","og:site_name":"John D. Cook | Applied Mathematics Consulting","og:type":"article","og:title":"Steiner Systems","og:description":"Steiner systems are combinatorial structures that often have geometrical interpretations. They appear in several areas of mathematics.","og:url":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2026\/11\/09\/steiner-systems\/","article:published_time":"2026-11-09T17:01:43+00:00","article:modified_time":"2026-11-09T17:10:54+00:00","twitter:card":"summary","twitter:title":"Steiner Systems","twitter:description":"Steiner systems are combinatorial structures that often have geometrical interpretations. They appear in several areas of mathematics.","twitter:image":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/twittercard.png"},"aioseo_meta_data":{"post_id":"248186","title":null,"description":"Steiner systems are combinatorial structures that often have geometrical interpretations. They appear in several areas of mathematics.","keywords":null,"keyphrases":{"focus":{"keyphrase":"","score":0,"analysis":{"keyphraseInTitle":{"score":0,"maxScore":9,"error":1}}},"additional":[]},"primary_term":null,"canonical_url":null,"og_title":null,"og_description":null,"og_object_type":"default","og_image_type":"default","og_image_url":null,"og_image_width":null,"og_image_height":null,"og_image_custom_url":null,"og_image_custom_fields":null,"og_video":"","og_custom_url":null,"og_article_section":null,"og_article_tags":null,"twitter_use_og":false,"twitter_card":"default","twitter_image_type":"default","twitter_image_url":null,"twitter_image_custom_url":null,"twitter_image_custom_fields":null,"twitter_title":null,"twitter_description":null,"schema":{"blockGraphs":[],"customGraphs":[],"default":{"data":{"Article":[],"Course":[],"Dataset":[],"FAQPage":[],"Movie":[],"Person":[],"Product":[],"ProductReview":[],"Car":[],"Recipe":[],"Service":[],"SoftwareApplication":[],"WebPage":[]},"graphName":"Article","isEnabled":true},"graphs":[]},"schema_type":"default","schema_type_options":null,"pillar_content":false,"robots_default":true,"robots_noindex":false,"robots_noarchive":false,"robots_nosnippet":false,"robots_nofollow":false,"robots_noimageindex":false,"robots_noodp":false,"robots_notranslate":false,"robots_max_snippet":"-1","robots_max_videopreview":"-1","robots_max_imagepreview":"large","priority":null,"frequency":"default","location":null,"local_seo":null,"breadcrumb_settings":null,"limit_modified_date":false,"created":"2026-11-06 14:58:50","updated":"2026-11-09 18:07:59","ai":{"faqs":[],"keyPoints":[],"schemas":[],"titles":[],"descriptions":[],"socialPosts":{"email":{"subject":"","preview":"","content":""},"linkedin":[],"twitter":[],"facebook":[],"instagram":[]}},"seo_analyzer_scan_date":null,"focus_keyword":null,"additional_keywords":null,"truseo_locale":null},"aioseo_breadcrumb":"<div class=\"aioseo-breadcrumbs\"><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb\">\n\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/\" title=\"Home\">Home<\/a>\n\t\t<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb-separator\">\u00bb<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb\">\n\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/category\/math\/\" title=\"Math\">Math<\/a>\n\t\t<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb-separator\">\u00bb<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb\">\n\t\t\tSteiner Systems\n\t\t<\/span><\/div>","aioseo_breadcrumb_json":[{"label":"Home","link":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/"},{"label":"Math","link":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/category\/math\/"},{"label":"Steiner Systems","link":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2026\/11\/09\/steiner-systems\/"}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/248186","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=248186"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/248186\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":248211,"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/248186\/revisions\/248211"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=248186"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=248186"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=248186"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}},{"id":248199,"date":"2026-11-09T08:26:09","date_gmt":"2026-11-09T14:26:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/?p=248199"},"modified":"2026-11-09T10:28:40","modified_gmt":"2026-11-09T16:28:40","slug":"finite-hyperbolic-planes","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2026\/11\/09\/finite-hyperbolic-planes\/","title":{"rendered":"Finite hyperbolic planes"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2026\/11\/03\/spherical-and-projective-geometry\/\">Euclid&#8217;s fifth postulate<\/a> says that given a line \u2113 and a point\u00a0<em>P<\/em> not on \u2113 , there is a unique line through\u00a0<em>P<\/em> parallel to \u2113. In the projective plane there are no parallel lines, and in the hyperbolic plane there are at least two lines through\u00a0<em>P<\/em> parallel to \u2113.<\/p>\n<p>Recent posts have looked at finite projective and affine planes. This post will look at finite hyperbolic planes.<\/p>\n<p>Finite projective planes come up far more often in application than finite hyperbolic planes. I&#8217;ve seen several resources on finite geometries that don&#8217;t mention the hyperbolic case. Finite hyperbolic geometries have less structure than their projective or affine counterparts and so are less useful.<\/p>\n<p>The definition of a finite hyperbolic plane isn&#8217;t entirely standardized. We will use the following axioms for this post.<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Any two distinct points lie on exactly one line.<\/li>\n<li>Given a line \u2113 and a point <em>P<\/em> not on \u2113, there exist at least two lines through <em>P<\/em> parallel to \u2113.<\/li>\n<li>There exist four points, no three collinear.<\/li>\n<li>Every line contains at least two points.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>An example of a system satisfying these axioms is the complete graph of six vertices. The nodes are the points and the edges are the lines. In set-theoretic terms, the points are the one-element subsets of {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6} and the lines are all possible two-element subsets.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-medium\" src=\"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/k6.png\" alt=\"Complete graph K6\" width=\"360\" height=\"405\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Note that lines in the finite hyperbolic plane are two element sets. The lines {5, 6} and {1, 3}, for example, are parallel because they do not intersect, even though the <em>representations<\/em> of {5, 6} and {1, 3} in the visualization above are not parallel in the Euclidean sense.<\/p>\n<p>There are many other examples of system satisfying the hyperbolic plane axioms. Too many in some sense. You could say finite hyperbolic systems are less common in application because they are more common in count.<\/p>\n<h2>Discrete geometry posts<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"link\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2026\/11\/08\/finite-geometries\/\">Finite projective planes<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"link\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2026\/11\/09\/finite-affine-planes\/\">Finite affine planes<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Euclid&#8217;s fifth postulate says that given a line \u2113 and a point\u00a0P not on \u2113 , there is a unique line through\u00a0P parallel to \u2113. In the projective plane there are no parallel lines, and in the hyperbolic plane there are at least two lines through\u00a0P parallel to \u2113. Recent posts have looked at finite [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[224],"class_list":["post-248199","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-geometry"],"acf":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t<!-- All in One SEO 5.0.5 - aioseo.com -->\n\t<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Finite systems satisfying the postulates of the hyperbolic plane. Less common in application than finite projective planes.\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"max-image-preview:large\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"author\" content=\"John\"\/>\n\t<meta name=\"keywords\" content=\"geometry\" \/>\n\t<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2026\/11\/09\/finite-hyperbolic-planes\/\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"generator\" content=\"All in One SEO (AIOSEO) 5.0.5\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"John D. Cook | Applied Mathematics Consulting\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Finite hyperbolic planes\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Finite systems satisfying the postulates of the hyperbolic plane. Less common in application than finite projective planes.\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2026\/11\/09\/finite-hyperbolic-planes\/\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-11-09T14:26:09+00:00\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-11-09T16:28:40+00:00\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Finite hyperbolic planes\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"Finite systems satisfying the postulates of the hyperbolic plane. Less common in application than finite projective planes.\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/twittercard.png\" \/>\n\t\t<!-- All in One SEO -->\n\n","aioseo_head_json":{"title":"Finite hyperbolic planes","description":"Finite systems satisfying the postulates of the hyperbolic plane. Less common in application than finite projective planes.","canonical_url":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2026\/11\/09\/finite-hyperbolic-planes\/","robots":"max-image-preview:large","keywords":"geometry","webmasterTools":{"miscellaneous":""},"schema":null,"og:locale":"en_US","og:site_name":"John D. Cook | Applied Mathematics Consulting","og:type":"article","og:title":"Finite hyperbolic planes","og:description":"Finite systems satisfying the postulates of the hyperbolic plane. Less common in application than finite projective planes.","og:url":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2026\/11\/09\/finite-hyperbolic-planes\/","article:published_time":"2026-11-09T14:26:09+00:00","article:modified_time":"2026-11-09T16:28:40+00:00","twitter:card":"summary","twitter:title":"Finite hyperbolic planes","twitter:description":"Finite systems satisfying the postulates of the hyperbolic plane. Less common in application than finite projective planes.","twitter:image":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/twittercard.png"},"aioseo_meta_data":{"post_id":"248199","title":null,"description":"Finite systems satisfying the postulates of the hyperbolic plane. Less common in application than finite projective planes.","keywords":null,"keyphrases":{"focus":{"keyphrase":"","score":0,"analysis":{"keyphraseInTitle":{"score":0,"maxScore":9,"error":1}}},"additional":[]},"primary_term":null,"canonical_url":null,"og_title":null,"og_description":null,"og_object_type":"default","og_image_type":"default","og_image_url":null,"og_image_width":null,"og_image_height":null,"og_image_custom_url":null,"og_image_custom_fields":null,"og_video":"","og_custom_url":null,"og_article_section":null,"og_article_tags":null,"twitter_use_og":false,"twitter_card":"default","twitter_image_type":"default","twitter_image_url":null,"twitter_image_custom_url":null,"twitter_image_custom_fields":null,"twitter_title":null,"twitter_description":null,"schema":{"blockGraphs":[],"customGraphs":[],"default":{"data":{"Article":[],"Course":[],"Dataset":[],"FAQPage":[],"Movie":[],"Person":[],"Product":[],"ProductReview":[],"Car":[],"Recipe":[],"Service":[],"SoftwareApplication":[],"WebPage":[]},"graphName":"Article","isEnabled":true},"graphs":[]},"schema_type":"default","schema_type_options":null,"pillar_content":false,"robots_default":true,"robots_noindex":false,"robots_noarchive":false,"robots_nosnippet":false,"robots_nofollow":false,"robots_noimageindex":false,"robots_noodp":false,"robots_notranslate":false,"robots_max_snippet":"-1","robots_max_videopreview":"-1","robots_max_imagepreview":"large","priority":null,"frequency":"default","location":null,"local_seo":null,"breadcrumb_settings":null,"limit_modified_date":false,"created":"2026-11-09 12:44:40","updated":"2026-11-09 17:02:29","ai":{"faqs":[],"keyPoints":[],"schemas":[],"titles":[],"descriptions":[],"socialPosts":{"email":{"subject":"","preview":"","content":""},"linkedin":[],"twitter":[],"facebook":[],"instagram":[]}},"seo_analyzer_scan_date":null,"focus_keyword":null,"additional_keywords":null,"truseo_locale":null},"aioseo_breadcrumb":"<div class=\"aioseo-breadcrumbs\"><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb\">\n\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/\" title=\"Home\">Home<\/a>\n\t\t<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb-separator\">\u00bb<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb\">\n\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/category\/uncategorized\/\" title=\"Uncategorized\">Uncategorized<\/a>\n\t\t<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb-separator\">\u00bb<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb\">\n\t\t\tFinite hyperbolic planes\n\t\t<\/span><\/div>","aioseo_breadcrumb_json":[{"label":"Home","link":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/"},{"label":"Uncategorized","link":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/category\/uncategorized\/"},{"label":"Finite hyperbolic planes","link":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2026\/11\/09\/finite-hyperbolic-planes\/"}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/248199","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=248199"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/248199\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":248207,"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/248199\/revisions\/248207"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=248199"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=248199"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=248199"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}},{"id":248190,"date":"2026-11-09T08:21:49","date_gmt":"2026-11-09T14:21:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/?p=248190"},"modified":"2026-11-09T08:26:48","modified_gmt":"2026-11-09T14:26:48","slug":"finite-affine-planes","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2026\/11\/09\/finite-affine-planes\/","title":{"rendered":"Finite Affine Planes"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The previous post was on <a href=\"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2026\/11\/08\/finite-geometries\/\">finite projective planes<\/a>. This post will look at finite affine planes and the next will look at <a href=\"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2026\/11\/09\/finite-hyperbolic-planes\/\">finite hyperbolic planes<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Affine geometry is essentially what remains of Euclidean geometry if you keep the incidence properties, e.g. wanting to know whether things intersect, and forget about metric properties such as segment lengths and angle measurements. As with projective planes, affine planes can be finite.<\/p>\n<p>The axioms of an affine plane are as follows.<\/p>\n<ol dir=\"ltr\">\n<li>Any two distinct points lie on exactly one line.<\/li>\n<li>For any line \u2113 and point <em>P<\/em> not on \u2113, there is exactly one line through <em>P<\/em> that doesn\u2019t intersect \u2113.<\/li>\n<li>There exist three points that are not collinear.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>The second axiom says that affine geometry is Euclidean, or maybe Euclidean-lite. It lacks features of Euclidean geometry, but it doesn&#8217;t contradict Euclidean geometry.<\/p>\n<p>To construct an example of a finite affine plane, let <em>p<\/em> be an odd prime and construct a <em>p<\/em> \u00d7 <em>p<\/em> grid with <em>x<\/em>&#8211; and <em>y<\/em>-coordinates 0, 1, 2, \u2026, <em>p<\/em> \u2212 1. The affine lines are essentially the Euclidean lines that pass through the grid points, if lines can wrap around the sides, i.e. you&#8217;re working on a discrete torus. Algebraically, lines are the solutions to\u00a0<em>x<\/em> =\u00a0<em>c<\/em> and\u00a0<em>y<\/em> =\u00a0<em>mx<\/em> +\u00a0<em>b<\/em> mod\u00a0<em>p<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>A finite affine plane always has\u00a0<em>n<\/em>\u00b2 points and <em>n<\/em>\u00b2 + <em>n<\/em> lines. The number\u00a0<em>n<\/em> can be an odd prime, or any prime power greater than 2. It is unknown whether there are examples in which\u00a0<em>n<\/em> is not a prime power. There are no affine planes of order 6 or 10, and the case of\u00a0<em>n<\/em> = 12 is open.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The previous post was on finite projective planes. This post will look at finite affine planes and the next will look at finite hyperbolic planes. Affine geometry is essentially what remains of Euclidean geometry if you keep the incidence properties, e.g. wanting to know whether things intersect, and forget about metric properties such as segment [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[224],"class_list":["post-248190","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-math","tag-geometry"],"acf":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t<!-- All in One SEO 5.0.5 - aioseo.com -->\n\t<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Affine geometry is what remains of Euclidean geometry if you keep the incidence properties and forget about metric properties. Affine planes can be finite.\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"max-image-preview:large\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"author\" content=\"John\"\/>\n\t<meta name=\"keywords\" content=\"geometry\" \/>\n\t<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2026\/11\/09\/finite-affine-planes\/\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"generator\" content=\"All in One SEO (AIOSEO) 5.0.5\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"John D. Cook | Applied Mathematics Consulting\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Finite Affine Planes\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Affine geometry is what remains of Euclidean geometry if you keep the incidence properties and forget about metric properties. Affine planes can be finite.\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2026\/11\/09\/finite-affine-planes\/\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-11-09T14:21:49+00:00\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-11-09T14:26:48+00:00\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Finite Affine Planes\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"Affine geometry is what remains of Euclidean geometry if you keep the incidence properties and forget about metric properties. Affine planes can be finite.\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/twittercard.png\" \/>\n\t\t<!-- All in One SEO -->\n\n","aioseo_head_json":{"title":"Finite Affine Planes","description":"Affine geometry is what remains of Euclidean geometry if you keep the incidence properties and forget about metric properties. Affine planes can be finite.","canonical_url":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2026\/11\/09\/finite-affine-planes\/","robots":"max-image-preview:large","keywords":"geometry","webmasterTools":{"miscellaneous":""},"schema":null,"og:locale":"en_US","og:site_name":"John D. Cook | Applied Mathematics Consulting","og:type":"article","og:title":"Finite Affine Planes","og:description":"Affine geometry is what remains of Euclidean geometry if you keep the incidence properties and forget about metric properties. Affine planes can be finite.","og:url":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2026\/11\/09\/finite-affine-planes\/","article:published_time":"2026-11-09T14:21:49+00:00","article:modified_time":"2026-11-09T14:26:48+00:00","twitter:card":"summary","twitter:title":"Finite Affine Planes","twitter:description":"Affine geometry is what remains of Euclidean geometry if you keep the incidence properties and forget about metric properties. Affine planes can be finite.","twitter:image":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/twittercard.png"},"aioseo_meta_data":{"post_id":"248190","title":null,"description":"Affine geometry is what remains of Euclidean geometry if you keep the incidence properties and forget about metric properties. Affine planes can be finite.","keywords":null,"keyphrases":{"focus":{"keyphrase":"","score":0,"analysis":{"keyphraseInTitle":{"score":0,"maxScore":9,"error":1}}},"additional":[]},"primary_term":null,"canonical_url":null,"og_title":null,"og_description":null,"og_object_type":"default","og_image_type":"default","og_image_url":null,"og_image_width":null,"og_image_height":null,"og_image_custom_url":null,"og_image_custom_fields":null,"og_video":"","og_custom_url":null,"og_article_section":null,"og_article_tags":null,"twitter_use_og":false,"twitter_card":"default","twitter_image_type":"default","twitter_image_url":null,"twitter_image_custom_url":null,"twitter_image_custom_fields":null,"twitter_title":null,"twitter_description":null,"schema":{"blockGraphs":[],"customGraphs":[],"default":{"data":{"Article":[],"Course":[],"Dataset":[],"FAQPage":[],"Movie":[],"Person":[],"Product":[],"ProductReview":[],"Car":[],"Recipe":[],"Service":[],"SoftwareApplication":[],"WebPage":[]},"graphName":"Article","isEnabled":true},"graphs":[]},"schema_type":"default","schema_type_options":null,"pillar_content":false,"robots_default":true,"robots_noindex":false,"robots_noarchive":false,"robots_nosnippet":false,"robots_nofollow":false,"robots_noimageindex":false,"robots_noodp":false,"robots_notranslate":false,"robots_max_snippet":"-1","robots_max_videopreview":"-1","robots_max_imagepreview":"large","priority":null,"frequency":"default","location":null,"local_seo":null,"breadcrumb_settings":null,"limit_modified_date":false,"created":"2026-11-08 23:33:30","updated":"2026-11-09 15:50:00","ai":{"faqs":[],"keyPoints":[],"schemas":[],"titles":[],"descriptions":[],"socialPosts":{"email":{"subject":"","preview":"","content":""},"linkedin":[],"twitter":[],"facebook":[],"instagram":[]}},"seo_analyzer_scan_date":null,"focus_keyword":null,"additional_keywords":null,"truseo_locale":null},"aioseo_breadcrumb":"<div class=\"aioseo-breadcrumbs\"><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb\">\n\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/\" title=\"Home\">Home<\/a>\n\t\t<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb-separator\">\u00bb<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb\">\n\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/category\/math\/\" title=\"Math\">Math<\/a>\n\t\t<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb-separator\">\u00bb<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb\">\n\t\t\tFinite Affine Planes\n\t\t<\/span><\/div>","aioseo_breadcrumb_json":[{"label":"Home","link":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/"},{"label":"Math","link":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/category\/math\/"},{"label":"Finite Affine Planes","link":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2026\/11\/09\/finite-affine-planes\/"}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/248190","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=248190"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/248190\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":248204,"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/248190\/revisions\/248204"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=248190"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=248190"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=248190"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}},{"id":248184,"date":"2026-11-08T17:23:49","date_gmt":"2026-11-08T23:23:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/?p=248184"},"modified":"2026-11-09T10:33:33","modified_gmt":"2026-11-09T16:33:33","slug":"finite-geometries","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2026\/11\/08\/finite-geometries\/","title":{"rendered":"Finite Projective Planes"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The idea of finite geometries sounds like an oxymoron the first time you hear of it, something like dry water or cold fire, but the axioms of some kinds of geometry can indeed be satisfied by finite models.<\/p>\n<p>The axioms of projective plane geometry are as follows.<\/p>\n<ol dir=\"ltr\">\n<li>Any two distinct points lie on exactly one line.<\/li>\n<li>Any two distinct lines meet in exactly one point.<\/li>\n<li>There exist four points, no three of which are collinear.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>The most famous example of a finite projective plane is the Fano plane.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-medium\" src=\"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/fano_numbered.png\" alt=\"Fano plane illustrtation\" width=\"517\" height=\"397\" \/><\/p>\n<p>It helps to switch back and forth between thinking of finite geometries geometrically and in terms of set theory. The fact that the Fano plane has an easy-to-understand illustration is fortunate, but not to be taken for granted. Also, it could be misleading to lean to heavily on the fact that the lines and points of finite geometry can, in this case, be represented by points and line segments (and a circle) in the Euclidean plane.<\/p>\n<p>The set-theoretic perspective is that the points are the one-element sets {1}, {2}, \u2026, {7}, and the lines are the sets listed in the legend of the graph: {1, 2, 5}, {1, 3, 7}, \u2026, {5, 6, 7}. It&#8217;s simple to confirm that any pair of points lines in exactly one of the three-element sets, that the intersection of any pair of the three-element sets is a one-element set, and that there are three points\u20141, 2, 3, and 4 will do\u2014such that no three lie on the same line, i.e. no three belong to the same three-element set.<\/p>\n<p>The Fano plane is the unique projective plane with 7 points, but there are four non-equivalent projective planes with 10 points.<\/p>\n<p>There are many other examples of non-isomorphic finite projective planes with the same number of points, but there are also many unsettled conjectures, at least as of an hour ago, regarding the existence of finite projective planes of various orders.<\/p>\n<p>Finite geometry might seem like a technicality, spaces that satisfy the axioms but are not what anyone had in mind when the axioms were codified. So why care about finite geometries? For one thing, unexpected examples are quite valuable since they help separate the consequences of a set of axioms from common expectations.<\/p>\n<p>For another, finite geometries come up in applications, such as combinatorics and cryptography. These discrete applications take advantage of intuition from traditional geometry. This intuition is an imperfect guide, so conclusions need to be verified by concrete calculations, but geometric intuition suggests what one ought to verify.<\/p>\n<h2>Related posts<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"link\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2025\/08\/11\/misleading-plots-of-elliptic-curves\/\">Misleading plots of elliptic curves<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"link\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2024\/07\/22\/linear-systems-over-finite-fields\/\">Linear systems over finite fields<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"link\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2022\/04\/25\/projective-duality\/\">Projective duality<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The idea of finite geometries sounds like an oxymoron the first time you hear of it, something like dry water or cold fire, but the axioms of some kinds of geometry can indeed be satisfied by finite models. The axioms of projective plane geometry are as follows. Any two distinct points lie on exactly one [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[224],"class_list":["post-248184","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-math","tag-geometry"],"acf":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t<!-- All in One SEO 5.0.5 - aioseo.com -->\n\t<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The idea of finite geometries sounds like an oxymoron, but the axioms of some kinds of geometry can be satisfied by finite models.\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"max-image-preview:large\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"author\" content=\"John\"\/>\n\t<meta name=\"keywords\" content=\"geometry\" \/>\n\t<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2026\/11\/08\/finite-geometries\/\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"generator\" content=\"All in One SEO (AIOSEO) 5.0.5\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"John D. Cook | Applied Mathematics Consulting\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Finite Projective Planes\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The idea of finite geometries sounds like an oxymoron, but the axioms of some kinds of geometry can be satisfied by finite models.\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2026\/11\/08\/finite-geometries\/\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-11-08T23:23:49+00:00\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-11-09T16:33:33+00:00\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Finite Projective Planes\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"The idea of finite geometries sounds like an oxymoron, but the axioms of some kinds of geometry can be satisfied by finite models.\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/twittercard.png\" \/>\n\t\t<!-- All in One SEO -->\n\n","aioseo_head_json":{"title":"Finite Projective Planes","description":"The idea of finite geometries sounds like an oxymoron, but the axioms of some kinds of geometry can be satisfied by finite models.","canonical_url":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2026\/11\/08\/finite-geometries\/","robots":"max-image-preview:large","keywords":"geometry","webmasterTools":{"miscellaneous":""},"schema":null,"og:locale":"en_US","og:site_name":"John D. Cook | Applied Mathematics Consulting","og:type":"article","og:title":"Finite Projective Planes","og:description":"The idea of finite geometries sounds like an oxymoron, but the axioms of some kinds of geometry can be satisfied by finite models.","og:url":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2026\/11\/08\/finite-geometries\/","article:published_time":"2026-11-08T23:23:49+00:00","article:modified_time":"2026-11-09T16:33:33+00:00","twitter:card":"summary","twitter:title":"Finite Projective Planes","twitter:description":"The idea of finite geometries sounds like an oxymoron, but the axioms of some kinds of geometry can be satisfied by finite models.","twitter:image":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/twittercard.png"},"aioseo_meta_data":{"post_id":"248184","title":null,"description":"The idea of finite geometries sounds like an oxymoron, but the axioms of some kinds of geometry can be satisfied by finite models.","keywords":null,"keyphrases":{"focus":{"keyphrase":"","score":0,"analysis":{"keyphraseInTitle":{"score":0,"maxScore":9,"error":1}}},"additional":[]},"primary_term":null,"canonical_url":null,"og_title":null,"og_description":null,"og_object_type":"default","og_image_type":"default","og_image_url":null,"og_image_width":null,"og_image_height":null,"og_image_custom_url":null,"og_image_custom_fields":null,"og_video":"","og_custom_url":null,"og_article_section":null,"og_article_tags":null,"twitter_use_og":false,"twitter_card":"default","twitter_image_type":"default","twitter_image_url":null,"twitter_image_custom_url":null,"twitter_image_custom_fields":null,"twitter_title":null,"twitter_description":null,"schema":{"blockGraphs":[],"customGraphs":[],"default":{"data":{"Article":[],"Course":[],"Dataset":[],"FAQPage":[],"Movie":[],"Person":[],"Product":[],"ProductReview":[],"Car":[],"Recipe":[],"Service":[],"SoftwareApplication":[],"WebPage":[]},"graphName":"Article","isEnabled":true},"graphs":[]},"schema_type":"default","schema_type_options":null,"pillar_content":false,"robots_default":true,"robots_noindex":false,"robots_noarchive":false,"robots_nosnippet":false,"robots_nofollow":false,"robots_noimageindex":false,"robots_noodp":false,"robots_notranslate":false,"robots_max_snippet":"-1","robots_max_videopreview":"-1","robots_max_imagepreview":"large","priority":null,"frequency":"default","location":null,"local_seo":null,"breadcrumb_settings":null,"limit_modified_date":false,"created":"2026-11-06 10:27:15","updated":"2026-11-09 17:02:29","ai":{"faqs":[],"keyPoints":[],"schemas":[],"titles":[],"descriptions":[],"socialPosts":{"email":{"subject":"","preview":"","content":""},"linkedin":[],"twitter":[],"facebook":[],"instagram":[]}},"seo_analyzer_scan_date":null,"focus_keyword":null,"additional_keywords":null,"truseo_locale":null},"aioseo_breadcrumb":"<div class=\"aioseo-breadcrumbs\"><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb\">\n\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/\" title=\"Home\">Home<\/a>\n\t\t<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb-separator\">\u00bb<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb\">\n\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/category\/math\/\" title=\"Math\">Math<\/a>\n\t\t<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb-separator\">\u00bb<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb\">\n\t\t\tFinite Projective Planes\n\t\t<\/span><\/div>","aioseo_breadcrumb_json":[{"label":"Home","link":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/"},{"label":"Math","link":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/category\/math\/"},{"label":"Finite Projective Planes","link":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2026\/11\/08\/finite-geometries\/"}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/248184","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=248184"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/248184\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":248208,"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/248184\/revisions\/248208"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=248184"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=248184"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=248184"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}},{"id":248181,"date":"2026-11-03T08:41:25","date_gmt":"2026-11-03T14:41:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/?p=248181"},"modified":"2026-11-03T08:41:25","modified_gmt":"2026-11-03T14:41:25","slug":"fraction-comparison-trick-revisited","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2026\/11\/03\/fraction-comparison-trick-revisited\/","title":{"rendered":"Fraction comparison trick revisited"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2021\/02\/25\/fraction-comparison-trick\/\">A few years ago<\/a> I wrote about a curious result: <em>a<\/em>\/<em>b<\/em>\u00a0is usually greater than\u00a0<em>c<\/em>\/<em>d<\/em>\u00a0when\u00a0<em>a\u00a0<\/em>+\u00a0<em>d<\/em>\u00a0is greater than\u00a0<em>b\u00a0<\/em>+\u00a0<em>c<\/em>. And &#8220;usually&#8221; means with probability 11\/12.<\/p>\n<p>As stated in the post, you can make this statement rigorous by choosing integers up to size\u00a0<em>N<\/em> at random and taking the limit as\u00a0<em>N<\/em> goes to infinity.<\/p>\n<p>We can also choose\u00a0<em>a<\/em>,\u00a0<em>b<\/em>,\u00a0<em>c<\/em>, and\u00a0<em>d<\/em> uniformly from [0, 1]. This is similar to choosing four integers up to <em>N<\/em> and dividing all the integers by\u00a0<em>N<\/em>, which doesn&#8217;t change the probabilities.<\/p>\n<p>Now\u00a0<em>a<\/em>\/<em>b<\/em> &gt;\u00a0<em>c<\/em>\/<em>d<\/em> if and only if\u00a0<em>ad<\/em> &gt;\u00a0<em>bc<\/em>, so another way to state the theorem is that<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">Prob(<em>ad<\/em> &gt;\u00a0<em>bc <\/em>| <em>a<\/em> +\u00a0<em>d<\/em> &gt;\u00a0<em>b<\/em> +\u00a0<em>c<\/em>) = 11\/12.<\/p>\n<p>Or to state it yet another way, pick two pairs of numbers at random. The probability that the pair with the larger sum also has the larger product is 11\/12. That seems more intuitive to me than the original statement.<\/p>\n<p>If <em>a<\/em> +\u00a0<em>d<\/em> is greater than\u00a0<em>b<\/em> +\u00a0<em>c<\/em>, it&#8217;s likely that\u00a0<em>a<\/em>\/<em>b<\/em> is greater than <em>c<\/em>\/<em>d<\/em>. It seems plausible that if\u00a0<em>a<\/em> +\u00a0<em>d<\/em> is <em>much<\/em> greater than <em>b<\/em> +\u00a0<em>c<\/em>, it&#8217;s <em>more<\/em> likely that <em>a<\/em>\/<em>b<\/em> is greater than <em>c<\/em>\/<em>d<\/em>. Or in terms of cross products, the more the sum of one pair is bigger than the sum of the other, the more likely the product of the former is to be greater than the latter. That is<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><em>f<\/em>(<em>r<\/em>) = Prob(<em>ad<\/em> &gt;\u00a0<em>bc <\/em>| (<em>a<\/em> +\u00a0<em>d<\/em>)\/(<em>b<\/em> +\u00a0<em>c<\/em>) \u2265 <em>r<\/em>)<\/p>\n<p>should be an increasing function of\u00a0<em>r<\/em>. We know the probability above equals 11\/12 when\u00a0<em>r<\/em> = 1. We expect that the probability should approach 1 as <em>r<\/em> goes to infinity.<\/p>\n<p>This is indeed the case, as shown in the plot below.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-medium\" src=\"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/f_of_r.png\" width=\"480\" height=\"380\" \/><\/p>\n<p>In particular, <em>f<\/em>(2) \u2248 0.99 and\u00a0<em>f<\/em>(6) \u2248 0.999. So if\u00a0<em>a<\/em> +\u00a0<em>d<\/em> is two (or six) times bigger than\u00a0<em>b +<\/em>\u00a0c, there is a 0.99 (or 0.999) probability that\u00a0<em>ad<\/em> is larger than\u00a0<em>bc<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>You can calculate\u00a0<em>f<\/em>(<em>r<\/em>) analytically or estimate it by simulation. I had Claude do both and they produce comparable results. There is a closed-form expression for\u00a0<em>f<\/em>(<em>r<\/em>) but it&#8217;s really complicated.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A few years ago I wrote about a curious result: a\/b\u00a0is usually greater than\u00a0c\/d\u00a0when\u00a0a\u00a0+\u00a0d\u00a0is greater than\u00a0b\u00a0+\u00a0c. And &#8220;usually&#8221; means with probability 11\/12. As stated in the post, you can make this statement rigorous by choosing integers up to size\u00a0N at random and taking the limit as\u00a0N goes to infinity. We can also choose\u00a0a,\u00a0b,\u00a0c, and\u00a0d uniformly [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[105],"class_list":["post-248181","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-math","tag-probability"],"acf":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t<!-- All in One SEO 5.0.5 - aioseo.com -->\n\t<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Revisiting the theorem that a\/b is usually greater than c\/d when a + d is greater than b + c. Different formulations and an extension.\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"max-image-preview:large\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"author\" content=\"John\"\/>\n\t<meta name=\"keywords\" content=\"probability\" \/>\n\t<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2026\/11\/03\/fraction-comparison-trick-revisited\/\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"generator\" content=\"All in One SEO (AIOSEO) 5.0.5\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"John D. Cook | Applied Mathematics Consulting\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Fraction comparison trick revisited\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Revisiting the theorem that a\/b is usually greater than c\/d when a + d is greater than b + c. Different formulations and an extension.\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2026\/11\/03\/fraction-comparison-trick-revisited\/\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-11-03T14:41:25+00:00\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-11-03T14:41:25+00:00\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Fraction comparison trick revisited\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"Revisiting the theorem that a\/b is usually greater than c\/d when a + d is greater than b + c. Different formulations and an extension.\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/twittercard.png\" \/>\n\t\t<!-- All in One SEO -->\n\n","aioseo_head_json":{"title":"Fraction comparison trick revisited","description":"Revisiting the theorem that a\/b is usually greater than c\/d when a + d is greater than b + c. Different formulations and an extension.","canonical_url":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2026\/11\/03\/fraction-comparison-trick-revisited\/","robots":"max-image-preview:large","keywords":"probability","webmasterTools":{"miscellaneous":""},"schema":null,"og:locale":"en_US","og:site_name":"John D. Cook | Applied Mathematics Consulting","og:type":"article","og:title":"Fraction comparison trick revisited","og:description":"Revisiting the theorem that a\/b is usually greater than c\/d when a + d is greater than b + c. Different formulations and an extension.","og:url":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2026\/11\/03\/fraction-comparison-trick-revisited\/","article:published_time":"2026-11-03T14:41:25+00:00","article:modified_time":"2026-11-03T14:41:25+00:00","twitter:card":"summary","twitter:title":"Fraction comparison trick revisited","twitter:description":"Revisiting the theorem that a\/b is usually greater than c\/d when a + d is greater than b + c. Different formulations and an extension.","twitter:image":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/twittercard.png"},"aioseo_meta_data":{"post_id":"248181","title":null,"description":"Revisiting the theorem that a\/b is usually greater than c\/d when a + d is greater than b + c. Different formulations and an extension.","keywords":null,"keyphrases":{"focus":{"keyphrase":"","score":0,"analysis":{"keyphraseInTitle":{"score":0,"maxScore":9,"error":1}}},"additional":[]},"primary_term":null,"canonical_url":null,"og_title":null,"og_description":null,"og_object_type":"default","og_image_type":"default","og_image_url":null,"og_image_width":null,"og_image_height":null,"og_image_custom_url":null,"og_image_custom_fields":null,"og_video":"","og_custom_url":null,"og_article_section":null,"og_article_tags":null,"twitter_use_og":false,"twitter_card":"default","twitter_image_type":"default","twitter_image_url":null,"twitter_image_custom_url":null,"twitter_image_custom_fields":null,"twitter_title":null,"twitter_description":null,"schema":{"blockGraphs":[],"customGraphs":[],"default":{"data":{"Article":[],"Course":[],"Dataset":[],"FAQPage":[],"Movie":[],"Person":[],"Product":[],"ProductReview":[],"Car":[],"Recipe":[],"Service":[],"SoftwareApplication":[],"WebPage":[]},"graphName":"Article","isEnabled":true},"graphs":[]},"schema_type":"default","schema_type_options":null,"pillar_content":false,"robots_default":true,"robots_noindex":false,"robots_noarchive":false,"robots_nosnippet":false,"robots_nofollow":false,"robots_noimageindex":false,"robots_noodp":false,"robots_notranslate":false,"robots_max_snippet":"-1","robots_max_videopreview":"-1","robots_max_imagepreview":"large","priority":null,"frequency":"default","location":null,"local_seo":null,"breadcrumb_settings":null,"limit_modified_date":false,"created":"2026-11-03 13:45:03","updated":"2026-11-03 18:58:01","ai":{"faqs":[],"keyPoints":[],"schemas":[],"titles":[],"descriptions":[],"socialPosts":{"email":{"subject":"","preview":"","content":""},"linkedin":[],"twitter":[],"facebook":[],"instagram":[]}},"seo_analyzer_scan_date":null,"focus_keyword":null,"additional_keywords":null,"truseo_locale":null},"aioseo_breadcrumb":"<div class=\"aioseo-breadcrumbs\"><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb\">\n\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/\" title=\"Home\">Home<\/a>\n\t\t<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb-separator\">\u00bb<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb\">\n\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/category\/math\/\" title=\"Math\">Math<\/a>\n\t\t<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb-separator\">\u00bb<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb\">\n\t\t\tFraction comparison trick revisited\n\t\t<\/span><\/div>","aioseo_breadcrumb_json":[{"label":"Home","link":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/"},{"label":"Math","link":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/category\/math\/"},{"label":"Fraction comparison trick revisited","link":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2026\/11\/03\/fraction-comparison-trick-revisited\/"}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/248181","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=248181"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/248181\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":248182,"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/248181\/revisions\/248182"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=248181"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=248181"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=248181"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}},{"id":248173,"date":"2026-11-03T06:33:10","date_gmt":"2026-11-03T12:33:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/?p=248173"},"modified":"2026-11-03T06:33:10","modified_gmt":"2026-11-03T12:33:10","slug":"spherical-and-projective-geometry","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2026\/11\/03\/spherical-and-projective-geometry\/","title":{"rendered":"Euclidean, Spherical, and Projective Geometry"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Spherical geometry is very tangible because we live on a sphere. Projective geometry seems much more exotic, and yet they&#8217;re closely related. To show how they&#8217;re connected, let&#8217;s go back to the origins of non-Euclidean geometry.<\/p>\n<h2>Euclidean geometry<\/h2>\n<p>Here are Euclid&#8217;s five postulates, statements about what geometric objects can be constructred.<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>To draw a\u00a0straight line\u00a0from any\u00a0point\u00a0to any point.<\/li>\n<li>To produce (extend) a\u00a0finite straight line\u00a0continuously in a straight line.<\/li>\n<li>To describe a\u00a0circle\u00a0with any centre and distance (radius).<\/li>\n<li>That all\u00a0right angles\u00a0are equal to one another.<\/li>\n<li>That, if a straight line falling on two straight lines makes the interior angles on the same side less than two right angles, the two straight lines, if produced indefinitely, meet on that side on which the angles are less than two right angles.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Clearly there&#8217;s something different about the fifth postulate, the parallel postulate. It&#8217;s much longer and more complicated than the other postulates. There was speculation from ancient times that the parallel postulate might be unnecessary, that it could be derived as a theorem rather than stated as an axiom.<\/p>\n<h2>Non-Euclidean geometry<\/h2>\n<p>Giovanni Girolamo Saccheri (1667\u20131733) tried to prove the fifth postulate by contradiction, and in the process began the study of non-Euclidean geometry. He wasn&#8217;t the first to try to prove the fifth postulate. Ptolemy, for example, tried to prove the fifth postulate as a theorem in the second century AD. But Saccheri was the first to try a proof by contradiction, or at least the first to extensively explore contradictions to the parallel postulate.<\/p>\n<p>A more modern formulation of the parallel postulate says<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">Given a line <em>\u2113<\/em> and a point <em>P<\/em> not on <em>\u2113<\/em>, there is exactly one line through <em>P<\/em> parallel to <em>\u2113<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>Non-Euclidean geometry replaces this axiom with an alternative, such as saying there are multiple lines parallel to <em>\u2113 <\/em>or that there are no lines parallel to <em>\u2113<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>Note that non-Euclidean geometry is not an arbitrary tinkering with the axioms of geometry just to see what happens. It tinkers with one specific axiom for motivated reasons.<\/p>\n<h2>Spherical geometry<\/h2>\n<p>You can create models of non-Euclidean geometry using Euclidean geometry. For example, spherical geometry is constructed by defining a (spherical) point as a (Euclidean) point on a sphere, and defining a (spherical) line to be a great circle, the intersection of a (Euclidean) plane with the sphere. In spherical geometry there are no parallel lines: all lines intersect.<\/p>\n<p>This example shows that non-Euclidean geometry need not be non-physical. If you leave general relativity out of the picture and think of physical space as undeniably Euclidean, it can still be useful to think of different geometries to describe objects in Euclidean space.<\/p>\n<h2>Projective geometry<\/h2>\n<p>In projective geometry, all distinct lines intersect at one point.<\/p>\n<p>In spherical geometry, all distinct lines intersect at two points, on opposite sides of a great circle. If you consider antipodal pairs of points on a sphere to be a single point in the projective plane, now all lines intersect at a single point. Projective geometry is just one step away from spherical geometry.<\/p>\n<p>The recent thread of posts started with a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2026\/10\/24\/polar-triangle\/\">post<\/a> a couple weeks ago about two versions of the law of cosines on a sphere, one for sides and one for angles. You can go from one to the other by going from a spherical triangle to its polar triangle. That started me going down the rabbit hole of poles and polars, first in spherical geometry, then in plane geometry, then in projective geometry, culminating <a href=\"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2026\/11\/01\/projective-poles-and-polars\/\">here<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Now we have two ways of producing poles and polars on a sphere: the original construction in terms of spherical geometry, and the projective construction. They are consistent: you can do spherical geometry, then identify antipodal points, or you can identify antipodal points, then do projective geometry. You end up at the same place by either path.<\/p>\n<p>One theme in the last few posts has been that projective geometry is not an arbitrary exercise in abstraction but a framework that can simplify how we think about things. For example, when I defined the polar triangle of a spherical triangle <a href=\"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2026\/10\/25\/poles-and-polars\/\">here<\/a>, I said that the vertices of the polar triangle are the poles of the sides of the original triangle. Imagine the side as the equator of the sphere and take one of the poles; that&#8217;s where the abstract concept of &#8220;pole&#8221; comes from. But which pole do you take? There is a convention for answering this question, but in projective geometry it doesn&#8217;t matter: both (spherical) poles constitute one (projective) point.<\/p>\n<h2>Posts in this series<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li class='link'><a href='https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2026\/10\/24\/polar-triangle\/'>Duality in spherical trig<\/a><\/li>\n<li class='link'><a href='https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2026\/10\/25\/poles-and-polars\/'>Poles and polars<\/a><\/li>\n<li class='link'><a href='https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2026\/10\/26\/inversion-in-an-ellipse\/'>Inversion in an ellipse<\/a><\/li>\n<li class='link'><a href='https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2026\/11\/01\/projective-poles-and-polars\/'>Unified view of poles and polars<\/a><\/li>\n<li class='link'><a href='https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2026\/11\/02\/projective-plane\/'>Making peace with the projective plane<\/a><\/li>\n<li class='link'><a href='https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2026\/11\/03\/hack-to-rigor\/'>From a hack to a rigorous definition<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Spherical geometry is very tangible because we live on a sphere. Projective geometry seems much more exotic, and yet they&#8217;re closely related. To show how they&#8217;re connected, let&#8217;s go back to the origins of non-Euclidean geometry. Euclidean geometry Here are Euclid&#8217;s five postulates, statements about what geometric objects can be constructred. To draw a\u00a0straight line\u00a0from [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[224],"class_list":["post-248173","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-math","tag-geometry"],"acf":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t<!-- All in One SEO 5.0.5 - aioseo.com -->\n\t<meta name=\"description\" content=\"From Euclidean geometry to projective geometry, by way of spherical geometry.\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"max-image-preview:large\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"author\" content=\"John\"\/>\n\t<meta name=\"keywords\" content=\"geometry\" \/>\n\t<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2026\/11\/03\/spherical-and-projective-geometry\/\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"generator\" content=\"All in One SEO (AIOSEO) 5.0.5\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"John D. Cook | Applied Mathematics Consulting\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Euclidean, Spherical, and Projective Geometry\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"From Euclidean geometry to projective geometry, by way of spherical geometry.\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2026\/11\/03\/spherical-and-projective-geometry\/\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-11-03T12:33:10+00:00\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-11-03T12:33:10+00:00\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Euclidean, Spherical, and Projective Geometry\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"From Euclidean geometry to projective geometry, by way of spherical geometry.\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/twittercard.png\" \/>\n\t\t<!-- All in One SEO -->\n\n","aioseo_head_json":{"title":"Euclidean, Spherical, and Projective Geometry","description":"From Euclidean geometry to projective geometry, by way of spherical geometry.","canonical_url":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2026\/11\/03\/spherical-and-projective-geometry\/","robots":"max-image-preview:large","keywords":"geometry","webmasterTools":{"miscellaneous":""},"schema":null,"og:locale":"en_US","og:site_name":"John D. Cook | Applied Mathematics Consulting","og:type":"article","og:title":"Euclidean, Spherical, and Projective Geometry","og:description":"From Euclidean geometry to projective geometry, by way of spherical geometry.","og:url":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2026\/11\/03\/spherical-and-projective-geometry\/","article:published_time":"2026-11-03T12:33:10+00:00","article:modified_time":"2026-11-03T12:33:10+00:00","twitter:card":"summary","twitter:title":"Euclidean, Spherical, and Projective Geometry","twitter:description":"From Euclidean geometry to projective geometry, by way of spherical geometry.","twitter:image":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/twittercard.png"},"aioseo_meta_data":{"post_id":"248173","title":null,"description":"From Euclidean geometry to projective geometry, by way of spherical geometry.","keywords":null,"keyphrases":{"focus":{"keyphrase":"","score":0,"analysis":{"keyphraseInTitle":{"score":0,"maxScore":9,"error":1}}},"additional":[]},"primary_term":null,"canonical_url":null,"og_title":null,"og_description":null,"og_object_type":"default","og_image_type":"default","og_image_url":null,"og_image_width":null,"og_image_height":null,"og_image_custom_url":null,"og_image_custom_fields":null,"og_video":"","og_custom_url":null,"og_article_section":null,"og_article_tags":null,"twitter_use_og":false,"twitter_card":"default","twitter_image_type":"default","twitter_image_url":null,"twitter_image_custom_url":null,"twitter_image_custom_fields":null,"twitter_title":null,"twitter_description":null,"schema":{"blockGraphs":[],"customGraphs":[],"default":{"data":{"Article":[],"Course":[],"Dataset":[],"FAQPage":[],"Movie":[],"Person":[],"Product":[],"ProductReview":[],"Car":[],"Recipe":[],"Service":[],"SoftwareApplication":[],"WebPage":[]},"graphName":"Article","isEnabled":true},"graphs":[]},"schema_type":"default","schema_type_options":null,"pillar_content":false,"robots_default":true,"robots_noindex":false,"robots_noarchive":false,"robots_nosnippet":false,"robots_nofollow":false,"robots_noimageindex":false,"robots_noodp":false,"robots_notranslate":false,"robots_max_snippet":"-1","robots_max_videopreview":"-1","robots_max_imagepreview":"large","priority":null,"frequency":"default","location":null,"local_seo":null,"breadcrumb_settings":null,"limit_modified_date":false,"created":"2026-11-03 09:34:41","updated":"2026-11-03 12:39:11","ai":{"faqs":[],"keyPoints":[],"schemas":[],"titles":[],"descriptions":[],"socialPosts":{"email":{"subject":"","preview":"","content":""},"linkedin":[],"twitter":[],"facebook":[],"instagram":[]}},"seo_analyzer_scan_date":null,"focus_keyword":null,"additional_keywords":null,"truseo_locale":null},"aioseo_breadcrumb":"<div class=\"aioseo-breadcrumbs\"><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb\">\n\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/\" title=\"Home\">Home<\/a>\n\t\t<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb-separator\">\u00bb<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb\">\n\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/category\/math\/\" title=\"Math\">Math<\/a>\n\t\t<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb-separator\">\u00bb<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb\">\n\t\t\tEuclidean, Spherical, and Projective Geometry\n\t\t<\/span><\/div>","aioseo_breadcrumb_json":[{"label":"Home","link":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/"},{"label":"Math","link":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/category\/math\/"},{"label":"Euclidean, Spherical, and Projective Geometry","link":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2026\/11\/03\/spherical-and-projective-geometry\/"}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/248173","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=248173"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/248173\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":248179,"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/248173\/revisions\/248179"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=248173"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=248173"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=248173"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}},{"id":248174,"date":"2026-11-03T04:45:19","date_gmt":"2026-11-03T10:45:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/?p=248174"},"modified":"2026-11-03T06:57:24","modified_gmt":"2026-11-03T12:57:24","slug":"hack-to-rigor","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2026\/11\/03\/hack-to-rigor\/","title":{"rendered":"How a programming might reinvent the projective plane"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>This post will show how a graphic programmer&#8217;s hack could lead to a rigorous definition of the projective plane.<\/p>\n<p>As mentioned in the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2026\/11\/02\/projective-plane\/\">previous post<\/a>, we start by adding some &#8220;points at infinity&#8221; to Euclidean plane to take care of exceptional situations. For example, instead of saying most pairs of lines intersect at a single point but some don&#8217;t intersect at all, you could say all pairs of lines intersect at a point, but for some pairs of lines, namely parallel lines, that intersection point is &#8220;at infinity.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Suppose you need to write a program to find the intersection of two lines. The usual way of doing this would be to implement a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2021\/12\/06\/partial-functions\/\">partial function<\/a> that takes two lines as input, and sometimes returns a point of intersection and sometimes does something else: it crashes, or throws an exception, or hangs. But if we add in points at infinity, our program could always return a point.<\/p>\n<p>But how are you going to represent points at infinity? It&#8217;s not enough to use a floating point infinity, because different lines intersect at different points at infinity. For example, the lines\u00a0<em>y<\/em> = 1 and\u00a0<em>y<\/em> = 2 intersect at the point at infinity in the horizontal direction, but the lines\u00a0<em>x<\/em> = 1 and\u00a0<em>x<\/em> = 2 intersect at the point at infinity in the vertical direction. You could say the former lines intersect at (o, inf) and the latter at (inf, 0), but that won&#8217;t work in general.<\/p>\n<p>The lines\u00a0<em>y<\/em> = 3<em>x<\/em> + 1 and\u00a0<em>y<\/em> = 3<em>x<\/em> + 1 intersect at the point at infinity with slope 3, but the lines <em>y<\/em> = 5<em>x<\/em> + 1 and\u00a0<em>y<\/em> = 5<em>x<\/em> + 1 intersect at the point at infinity with slope 5. If you say both pairs of lines meet at (inf, inf) you&#8217;ve lost information.<\/p>\n<p>So you come up with a hack. You represent points not as (<em>x<\/em>,\u00a0<em>y<\/em>) pairs but as (<em>x<\/em>,\u00a0<em>y<\/em>,\u00a0<em>f<\/em>) where\u00a0<em>x<\/em> and\u00a0<em>y<\/em> are real numbers but\u00a0<em>f<\/em> is a Boolean flag. Now (<em>x<\/em>,\u00a0<em>y<\/em>, true) represents the ordinary point (<em>x<\/em>,\u00a0<em>y<\/em>) and (<em>x<\/em>,\u00a0<em>y<\/em>, false) represents the point at infinity in the direction of the line from the origin to (<em>x<\/em>,\u00a0<em>y<\/em>). Problem solved!<\/p>\n<p>After a while, you realize that this hack can be useful for more than just finding the intersection of lines. You discover that if you use a real number instead of a Boolean for the last coordinate, you can implement translations and rotations using matrix multiplication. So you replace true and false with 1 and 0, do your matrix calculation, then divide by the last coordinate so the result ends in 1 or 0 again. And this works really well.<\/p>\n<p>This last coordinate is starting to act more like the other coordinates. You treat it as a peer when you multiply triples by a matrix, but only temporarily. You immediately normalize at the end to get back to more familiar territory.<\/p>\n<p>Maybe it occurs to you after a while that you&#8217;re doing something analogous the introduction of imaginary numbers. At first the square root of \u22121 was seen as a hack that produced correct answers. It wasn&#8217;t <em>really<\/em> a number but something <em>imagined<\/em> to be a number as an aid to calculation. Over time mathematicians got more comfortable with these imaginary numbers and explored what would happen if they were treated as first class citizens. Maybe you should do the same with this third coordinate that started out as a hack.<\/p>\n<p>This leads you to homogenous coordinates. A point in the extended plane you&#8217;ve created is represented by a triple (<em>x<\/em>,\u00a0<em>y<\/em>,\u00a0<em>z<\/em>) with the understanding that given a number \u03bb \u2260 0, (<em>x<\/em>,\u00a0<em>y<\/em>,\u00a0<em>z<\/em>) and (\u03bb<em>x<\/em>,\u00a0\u03bb<em>y<\/em>,\u00a0\u03bb<em>z<\/em>) represent the same point. This is the natural extension of always dividing by the last coordinate, if it&#8217;s not zero, so that the triple always ends in 1. And you discover after a while that you need to add in the requirement that not all the coordinates can be zero at the same time.<\/p>\n<p>You show this to a mathematician friend and he puts your construction in fancier language. He says you&#8217;re extended plane is \u211d\u00b3 minus the origin, modulo non-zero scalar multiplication. In other words, the points in your extended plane are equivalence classes of points in \u211d\u00b3.<\/p>\n<p>Now if you think about this geometrically, your equivalence classes are lines through the origin because that&#8217;s what you get when you look at all scalar multiples of a given vector. What started out as the plane with extra points added is now the set of all lines though the origin. That&#8217;s one way to define the projective plane: a point in the projective plane corresponds to a line through the origin in \u211d\u00b3. Furthermore, a line in the projective plane corresponds to a plane through the origin in \u211d\u00b3.<\/p>\n<p>Lines through the origin are determined by where they cross the unit sphere, so you could think of the projective plane as a sphere with one modification: because a line through the origin crosses the sphere in two antipodal points, we consider those two points in \u211d\u00b3 to be a single point in the projective plane.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This post will show how a graphic programmer&#8217;s hack could lead to a rigorous definition of the projective plane. As mentioned in the previous post, we start by adding some &#8220;points at infinity&#8221; to Euclidean plane to take care of exceptional situations. For example, instead of saying most pairs of lines intersect at a single [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-248174","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-math"],"acf":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t<!-- All in One SEO 5.0.5 - aioseo.com -->\n\t<meta name=\"description\" content=\"How a graphic programmer&#039;s hack could lead to a rigorous definition of the projective plane.\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"max-image-preview:large\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"author\" content=\"John\"\/>\n\t<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2026\/11\/03\/hack-to-rigor\/\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"generator\" content=\"All in One SEO (AIOSEO) 5.0.5\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"John D. Cook | Applied Mathematics Consulting\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"From a graphics hack to a rigorous model of the projective plane\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"How a graphic programmer&#039;s hack could lead to a rigorous definition of the projective plane.\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2026\/11\/03\/hack-to-rigor\/\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-11-03T10:45:19+00:00\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-11-03T12:57:24+00:00\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"From a graphics hack to a rigorous model of the projective plane\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"How a graphic programmer&#039;s hack could lead to a rigorous definition of the projective plane.\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/twittercard.png\" \/>\n\t\t<!-- All in One SEO -->\n\n","aioseo_head_json":{"title":"From a graphics hack to a rigorous model of the projective plane","description":"How a graphic programmer's hack could lead to a rigorous definition of the projective plane.","canonical_url":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2026\/11\/03\/hack-to-rigor\/","robots":"max-image-preview:large","keywords":"","webmasterTools":{"miscellaneous":""},"schema":null,"og:locale":"en_US","og:site_name":"John D. Cook | Applied Mathematics Consulting","og:type":"article","og:title":"From a graphics hack to a rigorous model of the projective plane","og:description":"How a graphic programmer's hack could lead to a rigorous definition of the projective plane.","og:url":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2026\/11\/03\/hack-to-rigor\/","article:published_time":"2026-11-03T10:45:19+00:00","article:modified_time":"2026-11-03T12:57:24+00:00","twitter:card":"summary","twitter:title":"From a graphics hack to a rigorous model of the projective plane","twitter:description":"How a graphic programmer's hack could lead to a rigorous definition of the projective plane.","twitter:image":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/twittercard.png"},"aioseo_meta_data":{"post_id":"248174","title":"From a graphics hack to a rigorous model of the projective plane","description":"How a graphic programmer's hack could lead to a rigorous definition of the projective plane.","keywords":null,"keyphrases":{"focus":{"keyphrase":"","score":0,"analysis":{"keyphraseInTitle":{"score":0,"maxScore":9,"error":1}}},"additional":[]},"primary_term":null,"canonical_url":null,"og_title":null,"og_description":null,"og_object_type":"default","og_image_type":"default","og_image_url":null,"og_image_width":null,"og_image_height":null,"og_image_custom_url":null,"og_image_custom_fields":null,"og_video":"","og_custom_url":null,"og_article_section":null,"og_article_tags":null,"twitter_use_og":false,"twitter_card":"default","twitter_image_type":"default","twitter_image_url":null,"twitter_image_custom_url":null,"twitter_image_custom_fields":null,"twitter_title":null,"twitter_description":null,"schema":{"blockGraphs":[],"customGraphs":[],"default":{"data":{"Article":[],"Course":[],"Dataset":[],"FAQPage":[],"Movie":[],"Person":[],"Product":[],"ProductReview":[],"Car":[],"Recipe":[],"Service":[],"SoftwareApplication":[],"WebPage":[]},"graphName":"Article","isEnabled":true},"graphs":[]},"schema_type":"default","schema_type_options":null,"pillar_content":false,"robots_default":true,"robots_noindex":false,"robots_noarchive":false,"robots_nosnippet":false,"robots_nofollow":false,"robots_noimageindex":false,"robots_noodp":false,"robots_notranslate":false,"robots_max_snippet":"-1","robots_max_videopreview":"-1","robots_max_imagepreview":"large","priority":null,"frequency":"default","location":null,"local_seo":null,"breadcrumb_settings":null,"limit_modified_date":false,"created":"2026-11-03 09:52:59","updated":"2026-11-03 13:57:12","ai":{"faqs":[],"keyPoints":[],"schemas":[],"titles":[],"descriptions":[],"socialPosts":{"email":{"subject":"","preview":"","content":""},"linkedin":[],"twitter":[],"facebook":[],"instagram":[]}},"seo_analyzer_scan_date":null,"focus_keyword":null,"additional_keywords":null,"truseo_locale":null},"aioseo_breadcrumb":"<div class=\"aioseo-breadcrumbs\"><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb\">\n\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/\" title=\"Home\">Home<\/a>\n\t\t<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb-separator\">\u00bb<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb\">\n\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/category\/math\/\" title=\"Math\">Math<\/a>\n\t\t<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb-separator\">\u00bb<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb\">\n\t\t\tHow a programming might reinvent the projective plane\n\t\t<\/span><\/div>","aioseo_breadcrumb_json":[{"label":"Home","link":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/"},{"label":"Math","link":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/category\/math\/"},{"label":"How a programming might reinvent the projective plane","link":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2026\/11\/03\/hack-to-rigor\/"}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/248174","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=248174"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/248174\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":248180,"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/248174\/revisions\/248180"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=248174"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=248174"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=248174"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}},{"id":248151,"date":"2026-11-02T08:44:02","date_gmt":"2026-11-02T14:44:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/?p=248151"},"modified":"2026-11-03T04:47:01","modified_gmt":"2026-11-03T10:47:01","slug":"projective-plane","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2026\/11\/02\/projective-plane\/","title":{"rendered":"Making peace with the projective plane"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In my newsletter I give an introduction to the latest few posts and occasionally give some additional commentary. In my latest newsletter I wrote<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Projective space and homogeneous coordinates seemed like arbitrary abstractions when I was a student because they were presented without any motivation. Much later I came to realize that they\u2019re natural, almost inevitable. Exceptional cases and hand-wavy references to objects \u201cat infinity\u201d go away when moving to projective space.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>My mathematics education was very top-down: abstractions first, specifics later (if ever). I was OK with that for a while, until I hit my abstraction tolerance sometime in grad school. Now I would advocate more of a bottom-up approach, motivating abstractions first rather than presenting them as a <em>fait accompli<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>The first time I saw the projective plane was probably in a topology class where someone said you could construct the plane by starting with a square and gluing opposite edges in a physically impossible way. This seemed like a gimmick, a way to construct a non-orientable manifold but not anything practical. Another construction is to say the projective plane is an ordinary sphere with antipodal points identified. I found that a little more satisfying, but it still unmotivated.<\/p>\n<p>What I would have appreciated was someone saying that the projective plane was invented to make geometry more elegant by eliminating exceptional cases and making rigorous the idea of things &#8220;at infinity.&#8221; For example, geometric calculations often have to treat vertical lines specially, but vertical lines are not special in projective geometry.<\/p>\n<p>You could start by saying we&#8217;re going to represent points in the plane not simply as (<em>x<\/em>,\u00a0<em>y<\/em>) but as (<em>x<\/em>,\u00a0<em>y<\/em>, 1) and use (<em>x<\/em>,\u00a0<em>y<\/em>, 0) for the point at infinity in the direction (<em>x<\/em>,\u00a0<em>y<\/em>). That may seem like a hack, but it&#8217;s certainly motivated. It&#8217;s exactly the sort of thing a graphics programmer would do. In fact, I imagine many programmers have done just that, independently bumping into projective geometry.<\/p>\n<p>After having introduced this extra coordinate, it&#8217;s natural to ask what would it mean if the last coordinate were something other than 0 or 1. You&#8217;ll quickly run into this when you start doing calculations on these extended coordinates. You could have a rule that you always normalize by dividing by the last coordinate, if it&#8217;s not zero, and then you have essentially discovered homogeneous coordinates. (<strong>Update<\/strong>; I develop this idea in more detail in the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2026\/11\/03\/hack-to-rigor\/\">next post<\/a>.)<\/p>\n<p>You&#8217;ll see something like the approach above in elliptic curve cryptography. Programmers wanting to implement encryption algorithms are thinking concretely in terms of (<em>x<\/em>,\u00a0<em>y<\/em>) points, until they have to worry about a mysterious &#8220;point at infinity&#8221; and handle it correctly. Then homogenous coordinates appear as a tool for getting out of a bind.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">***<\/p>\n<p>I thought about titling this post something like &#8220;Dr. Strangelove, or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and and Love the Projective Plane&#8221; but I wasn&#8217;t sure how well that would go over. I doubt many readers have seen the 1964 movie this is alluding to, but the trope &#8220;How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love \u2026&#8221; is more widely known than the movie itself.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In my newsletter I give an introduction to the latest few posts and occasionally give some additional commentary. In my latest newsletter I wrote Projective space and homogeneous coordinates seemed like arbitrary abstractions when I was a student because they were presented without any motivation. Much later I came to realize that they\u2019re natural, almost [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[154,224],"class_list":["post-248151","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-math","tag-algebraic-geometry","tag-geometry"],"acf":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t<!-- All in One SEO 5.0.5 - aioseo.com -->\n\t<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Developing projective geometry as the solution to practical problems rather than an unmotivated fait acompli.\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"max-image-preview:large\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"author\" content=\"John\"\/>\n\t<meta name=\"keywords\" content=\"algebraic geometry,geometry\" \/>\n\t<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2026\/11\/02\/projective-plane\/\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"generator\" content=\"All in One SEO (AIOSEO) 5.0.5\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"John D. Cook | Applied Mathematics Consulting\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Making peace with the projective plane\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Developing projective geometry as the solution to practical problems rather than an unmotivated fait acompli.\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2026\/11\/02\/projective-plane\/\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-11-02T14:44:02+00:00\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-11-03T10:47:01+00:00\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Making peace with the projective plane\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"Developing projective geometry as the solution to practical problems rather than an unmotivated fait acompli.\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/twittercard.png\" \/>\n\t\t<!-- All in One SEO -->\n\n","aioseo_head_json":{"title":"Making peace with the projective plane","description":"Developing projective geometry as the solution to practical problems rather than an unmotivated fait acompli.","canonical_url":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2026\/11\/02\/projective-plane\/","robots":"max-image-preview:large","keywords":"algebraic geometry,geometry","webmasterTools":{"miscellaneous":""},"schema":null,"og:locale":"en_US","og:site_name":"John D. Cook | Applied Mathematics Consulting","og:type":"article","og:title":"Making peace with the projective plane","og:description":"Developing projective geometry as the solution to practical problems rather than an unmotivated fait acompli.","og:url":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2026\/11\/02\/projective-plane\/","article:published_time":"2026-11-02T14:44:02+00:00","article:modified_time":"2026-11-03T10:47:01+00:00","twitter:card":"summary","twitter:title":"Making peace with the projective plane","twitter:description":"Developing projective geometry as the solution to practical problems rather than an unmotivated fait acompli.","twitter:image":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/twittercard.png"},"aioseo_meta_data":{"post_id":"248151","title":null,"description":"Developing projective geometry as the solution to practical problems rather than an unmotivated fait acompli.","keywords":null,"keyphrases":{"focus":{"keyphrase":"","score":0,"analysis":{"keyphraseInTitle":{"score":0,"maxScore":9,"error":1}}},"additional":[]},"primary_term":null,"canonical_url":null,"og_title":null,"og_description":null,"og_object_type":"default","og_image_type":"default","og_image_url":null,"og_image_width":null,"og_image_height":null,"og_image_custom_url":null,"og_image_custom_fields":null,"og_video":"","og_custom_url":null,"og_article_section":null,"og_article_tags":null,"twitter_use_og":false,"twitter_card":"default","twitter_image_type":"default","twitter_image_url":null,"twitter_image_custom_url":null,"twitter_image_custom_fields":null,"twitter_title":null,"twitter_description":null,"schema":{"blockGraphs":[],"customGraphs":[],"default":{"data":{"Article":[],"Course":[],"Dataset":[],"FAQPage":[],"Movie":[],"Person":[],"Product":[],"ProductReview":[],"Car":[],"Recipe":[],"Service":[],"SoftwareApplication":[],"WebPage":[]},"graphName":"Article","isEnabled":true},"graphs":[]},"schema_type":"default","schema_type_options":null,"pillar_content":false,"robots_default":true,"robots_noindex":false,"robots_noarchive":false,"robots_nosnippet":false,"robots_nofollow":false,"robots_noimageindex":false,"robots_noodp":false,"robots_notranslate":false,"robots_max_snippet":"-1","robots_max_videopreview":"-1","robots_max_imagepreview":"large","priority":null,"frequency":"default","location":null,"local_seo":null,"breadcrumb_settings":null,"limit_modified_date":false,"created":"2026-11-02 11:50:00","updated":"2026-11-03 11:37:00","ai":{"faqs":[],"keyPoints":[],"schemas":[],"titles":[],"descriptions":[],"socialPosts":{"email":{"subject":"","preview":"","content":""},"linkedin":[],"twitter":[],"facebook":[],"instagram":[]}},"seo_analyzer_scan_date":null,"focus_keyword":null,"additional_keywords":null,"truseo_locale":null},"aioseo_breadcrumb":"<div class=\"aioseo-breadcrumbs\"><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb\">\n\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/\" title=\"Home\">Home<\/a>\n\t\t<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb-separator\">\u00bb<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb\">\n\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/category\/math\/\" title=\"Math\">Math<\/a>\n\t\t<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb-separator\">\u00bb<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb\">\n\t\t\tMaking peace with the projective plane\n\t\t<\/span><\/div>","aioseo_breadcrumb_json":[{"label":"Home","link":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/"},{"label":"Math","link":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/category\/math\/"},{"label":"Making peace with the projective plane","link":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2026\/11\/02\/projective-plane\/"}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/248151","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=248151"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/248151\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":248177,"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/248151\/revisions\/248177"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=248151"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=248151"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=248151"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}},{"id":248142,"date":"2026-11-01T14:29:54","date_gmt":"2026-11-01T20:29:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/?p=248142"},"modified":"2026-11-01T14:42:42","modified_gmt":"2026-11-01T20:42:42","slug":"projective-poles-and-polars","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2026\/11\/01\/projective-poles-and-polars\/","title":{"rendered":"A unified view of poles and polars"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I wrote several posts on poles and polars a few days ago. First, I wrote about the dual of a spherical triangle, called the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2026\/10\/24\/polar-triangle\/\">polar triangle<\/a>. Then I wrote about <a href=\"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2026\/10\/25\/poles-and-polars\/\">poles and polars<\/a> in plane geometry and briefly mentioned the extension to projective geometry.<\/p>\n<p>Poles and polars are a little awkward in the plane because you have to pay attention to special cases. Poles and polars are relative to a conic section, and are defined\/computed differently depending on whether you&#8217;re taking the dual with respect to an <a href=\"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2026\/10\/26\/inversion-in-an-ellipse\/\">ellipse<\/a>, parabola, or hyperbola. Also, the polar of the center of a conic section isn&#8217;t defined.<\/p>\n<h2>Projective space<\/h2>\n<p>If you move from the Euclidean plane to the projective plane, the exceptions go away, though it may not seem so if you&#8217;re talking about points at infinity or lines at infinity. If you fully commit to working in projective space, there aren&#8217;t any hand-wavy points or lines &#8220;at infinity.&#8221; There&#8217;s not even a distinction between ellipses, parabolas, and hyperbolas.<\/p>\n<p>There&#8217;s no such thing as a free lunch, and the cost of this elegant unification is moving to a bigger geometric space with a different coordinate system. Instead of working in the Euclidean spaces <em>R<\/em>\u00b2 or <em>R<\/em><sup><em>n<\/em><\/sup>, we work in <em>P<\/em><sup><em>n<\/em><\/sup>\u00a0over a field <em>F<\/em> which could be <em>R<\/em> but doesn&#8217;t need to be [1].<\/p>\n<p>The coordinates on <em>P<\/em><sup><em>n<\/em><\/sup>\u00a0are homogeneous coordinates, (<em>n<\/em> + 1)-tuples of field elements, not all equal to zero, with two (<em>n<\/em> + 1)-tuples representing the same point if they are proportional, i.e. one is a non-zero multiple of the other.<\/p>\n<p>We can embed <em>R<\/em><sup><em>n<\/em><\/sup> in <em>P<\/em><sup><em>n<\/em><\/sup> by adding an extra coordinate on the end, set equal to 1. You could think of this extra coordinate as a <strong>switch<\/strong>, set to 1 for finite points and set to 0 for infinite points. But this distinction between finite and infinite points is an artifact of the embedding, not a property of <em>P<\/em><sup><em>n<\/em><\/sup>: there are no special points in <em>P<\/em><sup><em>n<\/em><\/sup>. A point that is &#8220;at infinity&#8221; in one embedding of <em>R<\/em><sup><em>n<\/em><\/sup> in <em>P<\/em><sup><em>n<\/em><\/sup> need not be in another embedding.<\/p>\n<h2>Poles and polars<\/h2>\n<p>Once you accept the need to work in homogeneous coordinates, everything becomes simple and consistent.<\/p>\n<p>A quadric (a conic section when <em>n<\/em> = 2) is the set of points<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">{<em>x<\/em> :\u00a0<em>x<\/em>\u1d40<em>A<\/em><em>x<\/em> = 0}<\/p>\n<p>where <em>A<\/em> is a non-singular (<em>n<\/em> + 1) by (<em>n<\/em> + 1) symmetric matrix over <em>F<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>The <strong>polar<\/strong> of a point <em>p<\/em> is the hyperplane<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">{<em>x<\/em> : <em>p<\/em>\u1d40<em>A<\/em><em>x<\/em> = 0}<\/p>\n<p>and the <strong>pole<\/strong> of a hyperplane<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><em>H<\/em> = {<em>x<\/em> : <em>u<\/em>\u1d40<em>x<\/em> = 0}<\/p>\n<p>is the point<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><em>p<\/em> = <em>A<\/em><sup>\u22121<\/sup> <em>u<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>Notice there&#8217;s no mention of &#8220;infinity&#8221; in this section. All the calculations take place in the field\u00a0<em>F<\/em> with no points at infinity added.<\/p>\n<p>[1] The only requirement is that the field <em>F<\/em> cannot have characteristic 2. So\u00a0<em>F<\/em> could be the reals, the rationals, the complex numbers, etc.\u00a0<em>F<\/em> could even be a finite field as long as the number of elements in\u00a0<em>F<\/em> is not a power of 2.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I wrote several posts on poles and polars a few days ago. First, I wrote about the dual of a spherical triangle, called the polar triangle. Then I wrote about poles and polars in plane geometry and briefly mentioned the extension to projective geometry. Poles and polars are a little awkward in the plane because [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[154,224],"class_list":["post-248142","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-math","tag-algebraic-geometry","tag-geometry"],"acf":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t<!-- All in One SEO 5.0.5 - aioseo.com -->\n\t<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Poles and polars are a little awkward in Euclidean geometry but simple and elegant in projective geometry.\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"max-image-preview:large\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"author\" content=\"John\"\/>\n\t<meta name=\"keywords\" content=\"algebraic geometry,geometry\" \/>\n\t<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2026\/11\/01\/projective-poles-and-polars\/\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"generator\" content=\"All in One SEO (AIOSEO) 5.0.5\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"John D. Cook | Applied Mathematics Consulting\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Poles &amp; polars in projective space with homogeneous coordinates\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Poles and polars are a little awkward in Euclidean geometry but simple and elegant in projective geometry.\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2026\/11\/01\/projective-poles-and-polars\/\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-11-01T20:29:54+00:00\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-11-01T20:42:42+00:00\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Poles &amp; polars in projective space with homogeneous coordinates\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"Poles and polars are a little awkward in Euclidean geometry but simple and elegant in projective geometry.\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/twittercard.png\" \/>\n\t\t<!-- All in One SEO -->\n\n","aioseo_head_json":{"title":"Poles & polars in projective space with homogeneous coordinates","description":"Poles and polars are a little awkward in Euclidean geometry but simple and elegant in projective geometry.","canonical_url":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2026\/11\/01\/projective-poles-and-polars\/","robots":"max-image-preview:large","keywords":"algebraic geometry,geometry","webmasterTools":{"miscellaneous":""},"schema":null,"og:locale":"en_US","og:site_name":"John D. Cook | Applied Mathematics Consulting","og:type":"article","og:title":"Poles &amp; polars in projective space with homogeneous coordinates","og:description":"Poles and polars are a little awkward in Euclidean geometry but simple and elegant in projective geometry.","og:url":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2026\/11\/01\/projective-poles-and-polars\/","article:published_time":"2026-11-01T20:29:54+00:00","article:modified_time":"2026-11-01T20:42:42+00:00","twitter:card":"summary","twitter:title":"Poles &amp; polars in projective space with homogeneous coordinates","twitter:description":"Poles and polars are a little awkward in Euclidean geometry but simple and elegant in projective geometry.","twitter:image":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/twittercard.png"},"aioseo_meta_data":{"post_id":"248142","title":"Poles &amp; polars in projective space with homogeneous coordinates","description":"Poles and polars are a little awkward in Euclidean geometry but simple and elegant in projective geometry.","keywords":null,"keyphrases":{"focus":{"keyphrase":"","score":0,"analysis":{"keyphraseInTitle":{"score":0,"maxScore":9,"error":1}}},"additional":[]},"primary_term":null,"canonical_url":null,"og_title":null,"og_description":null,"og_object_type":"default","og_image_type":"default","og_image_url":null,"og_image_width":null,"og_image_height":null,"og_image_custom_url":null,"og_image_custom_fields":null,"og_video":"","og_custom_url":null,"og_article_section":null,"og_article_tags":null,"twitter_use_og":false,"twitter_card":"default","twitter_image_type":"default","twitter_image_url":null,"twitter_image_custom_url":null,"twitter_image_custom_fields":null,"twitter_title":null,"twitter_description":null,"schema":{"blockGraphs":[],"customGraphs":[],"default":{"data":{"Article":[],"Course":[],"Dataset":[],"FAQPage":[],"Movie":[],"Person":[],"Product":[],"ProductReview":[],"Car":[],"Recipe":[],"Service":[],"SoftwareApplication":[],"WebPage":[]},"graphName":"Article","isEnabled":true},"graphs":[]},"schema_type":"default","schema_type_options":null,"pillar_content":false,"robots_default":true,"robots_noindex":false,"robots_noarchive":false,"robots_nosnippet":false,"robots_nofollow":false,"robots_noimageindex":false,"robots_noodp":false,"robots_notranslate":false,"robots_max_snippet":"-1","robots_max_videopreview":"-1","robots_max_imagepreview":"large","priority":null,"frequency":"default","location":null,"local_seo":null,"breadcrumb_settings":null,"limit_modified_date":false,"created":"2026-11-01 19:27:21","updated":"2026-11-01 21:36:17","ai":{"faqs":[],"keyPoints":[],"schemas":[],"titles":[],"descriptions":[],"socialPosts":{"email":{"subject":"","preview":"","content":""},"linkedin":[],"twitter":[],"facebook":[],"instagram":[]}},"seo_analyzer_scan_date":null,"focus_keyword":null,"additional_keywords":null,"truseo_locale":null},"aioseo_breadcrumb":"<div class=\"aioseo-breadcrumbs\"><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb\">\n\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/\" title=\"Home\">Home<\/a>\n\t\t<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb-separator\">\u00bb<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb\">\n\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/category\/math\/\" title=\"Math\">Math<\/a>\n\t\t<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb-separator\">\u00bb<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb\">\n\t\t\tA unified view of poles and polars\n\t\t<\/span><\/div>","aioseo_breadcrumb_json":[{"label":"Home","link":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/"},{"label":"Math","link":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/category\/math\/"},{"label":"A unified view of poles and polars","link":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2026\/11\/01\/projective-poles-and-polars\/"}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/248142","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=248142"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/248142\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":248148,"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/248142\/revisions\/248148"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=248142"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=248142"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=248142"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}},{"id":248136,"date":"2026-10-28T06:51:51","date_gmt":"2026-10-28T11:51:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/?p=248136"},"modified":"2026-10-28T06:53:07","modified_gmt":"2026-10-28T11:53:07","slug":"the-unbalanced-group-theorem","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2026\/10\/28\/the-unbalanced-group-theorem\/","title":{"rendered":"The Unbalanced Group Theorem"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The classification of finite simple groups (CFSG) has been called the biggest theorem in mathematics. It is big, not necessarily in terms of its importance, but in the sense that its proof developed over the course of decades and thousands of pages of journal articles.<\/p>\n<p>Two days ago <a href=\"https:\/\/cfsg.axiommath.ai\/\">Axiom<\/a> announced it had formalized the proof of CFSG in 43.1 million lines of Lean. If you click on the link for the accompanying paper, you&#8217;ll find that the title of the paper is <strong>The Unbalanced Group Theorem<\/strong>, not The Classification of Finite Simple Groups. Why is that?<\/p>\n<p>The unbalanced group theorem (UGT) is a key component of the CFSG. In the course of their effort to formalize CFSG Axiom found counterexamples to an assertion that the 1986 proof of UGT depends on. The UGT, and the CFSG that depends on it, is correct, but the proof was flawed. Axiom formalized the entire CFSG but focused their paper on their new proof of the UGT.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">***<\/p>\n<p>What exactly does the UGT say? For that matter, what is a finite simple group?<\/p>\n<p>A short post like this can only go into so much detail, but I&#8217;ll see what I can do.<\/p>\n<p>A group represents some kind of symmetry. Groups can be built out of simple groups sorta like the way integers can be built out of primes. See more on the comparison between simple groups and prime numbers <a href=\"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2023\/09\/26\/prime-numbers-simple-groups\/\">here<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>The CFSG says that every finite simple group is cyclic, alternating, of Lie type, or sporadic. The UGT is a technical result used in proving that nothing is missing from this list of possibilities.<\/p>\n<p>What does it mean for a group to be &#8220;unbalanced&#8221;? This depends on a few preliminary definitions.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Define <em>O<\/em>(<em>G<\/em>) to be the largest normal subgroup of\u00a0<em>G<\/em> with an odd number of elements.<\/li>\n<li>An element <em>t<\/em> in <em>G<\/em> is called an involution if it has order 2:\u00a0<em>t<\/em> is not the identity but\u00a0<em>t<\/em>\u00b2 is.<\/li>\n<li>The centralizer of an element\u00a0<em>t<\/em> of a group\u00a0<em>G<\/em>, written <em>C<\/em><sub><em>G<\/em><\/sub>(<em>t<\/em>), is the set of elements of G that commute with\u00a0<em>t<\/em>.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>A group <em>G<\/em> is <strong>unbalanced<\/strong> if <em>O<\/em>(<em>C<\/em><sub><em>G<\/em><\/sub>(<em>t<\/em>)) is a not a subgroup of <em>O<\/em>(<em>G<\/em>) for some involution <em>t<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>The UGT is a classification theorem for unbalanced groups.<\/p>\n<h2>Related posts<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li class='link'><a href='https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2020\/08\/27\/how-big-is-the-monster\/'>How big is the monster?<\/a><\/li>\n<li class='link'><a href='https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2018\/09\/02\/orders-of-finite-simple-groups\/'>Orders of finite simple groups<\/a><\/li>\n<li class='link'><a href='https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2018\/09\/09\/duplication-in-cfsg\/'>Overlaps in the CFSG<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The classification of finite simple groups (CFSG) has been called the biggest theorem in mathematics. It is big, not necessarily in terms of its importance, but in the sense that its proof developed over the course of decades and thousands of pages of journal articles. Two days ago Axiom announced it had formalized the proof [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[201],"class_list":["post-248136","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-math","tag-group-theory"],"acf":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t<!-- All in One SEO 5.0.5 - aioseo.com -->\n\t<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The unbalanced group theorem is a key theorem in the classification of finite simple groups. It&#039;s proof was wrong but the theorem is true.\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"max-image-preview:large\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"author\" content=\"John\"\/>\n\t<meta name=\"keywords\" content=\"group theory\" \/>\n\t<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2026\/10\/28\/the-unbalanced-group-theorem\/\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"generator\" content=\"All in One SEO (AIOSEO) 5.0.5\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"John D. Cook | Applied Mathematics Consulting\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Unbalanced Group Theorem\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The unbalanced group theorem is a key theorem in the classification of finite simple groups. It&#039;s proof was wrong but the theorem is true.\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2026\/10\/28\/the-unbalanced-group-theorem\/\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-10-28T11:51:51+00:00\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-10-28T11:53:07+00:00\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"The Unbalanced Group Theorem\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"The unbalanced group theorem is a key theorem in the classification of finite simple groups. It&#039;s proof was wrong but the theorem is true.\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/twittercard.png\" \/>\n\t\t<!-- All in One SEO -->\n\n","aioseo_head_json":{"title":"The Unbalanced Group Theorem","description":"The unbalanced group theorem is a key theorem in the classification of finite simple groups. It's proof was wrong but the theorem is true.","canonical_url":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2026\/10\/28\/the-unbalanced-group-theorem\/","robots":"max-image-preview:large","keywords":"group theory","webmasterTools":{"miscellaneous":""},"schema":null,"og:locale":"en_US","og:site_name":"John D. Cook | Applied Mathematics Consulting","og:type":"article","og:title":"The Unbalanced Group Theorem","og:description":"The unbalanced group theorem is a key theorem in the classification of finite simple groups. It's proof was wrong but the theorem is true.","og:url":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2026\/10\/28\/the-unbalanced-group-theorem\/","article:published_time":"2026-10-28T11:51:51+00:00","article:modified_time":"2026-10-28T11:53:07+00:00","twitter:card":"summary","twitter:title":"The Unbalanced Group Theorem","twitter:description":"The unbalanced group theorem is a key theorem in the classification of finite simple groups. It's proof was wrong but the theorem is true.","twitter:image":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/twittercard.png"},"aioseo_meta_data":{"post_id":"248136","title":null,"description":"The unbalanced group theorem is a key theorem in the classification of finite simple groups. It's proof was wrong but the theorem is true.","keywords":null,"keyphrases":{"focus":{"keyphrase":"","score":0,"analysis":{"keyphraseInTitle":{"score":0,"maxScore":9,"error":1}}},"additional":[]},"primary_term":null,"canonical_url":null,"og_title":null,"og_description":null,"og_object_type":"default","og_image_type":"default","og_image_url":null,"og_image_width":null,"og_image_height":null,"og_image_custom_url":null,"og_image_custom_fields":null,"og_video":"","og_custom_url":null,"og_article_section":null,"og_article_tags":null,"twitter_use_og":false,"twitter_card":"default","twitter_image_type":"default","twitter_image_url":null,"twitter_image_custom_url":null,"twitter_image_custom_fields":null,"twitter_title":null,"twitter_description":null,"schema":{"blockGraphs":[],"customGraphs":[],"default":{"data":{"Article":[],"Course":[],"Dataset":[],"FAQPage":[],"Movie":[],"Person":[],"Product":[],"ProductReview":[],"Car":[],"Recipe":[],"Service":[],"SoftwareApplication":[],"WebPage":[]},"graphName":"Article","isEnabled":true},"graphs":[]},"schema_type":"default","schema_type_options":null,"pillar_content":false,"robots_default":true,"robots_noindex":false,"robots_noarchive":false,"robots_nosnippet":false,"robots_nofollow":false,"robots_noimageindex":false,"robots_noodp":false,"robots_notranslate":false,"robots_max_snippet":"-1","robots_max_videopreview":"-1","robots_max_imagepreview":"large","priority":null,"frequency":"default","location":null,"local_seo":null,"breadcrumb_settings":null,"limit_modified_date":false,"created":"2026-10-28 10:49:46","updated":"2026-10-28 13:20:15","ai":{"faqs":[],"keyPoints":[],"schemas":[],"titles":[],"descriptions":[],"socialPosts":{"email":{"subject":"","preview":"","content":""},"linkedin":[],"twitter":[],"facebook":[],"instagram":[]}},"seo_analyzer_scan_date":null,"focus_keyword":null,"additional_keywords":null,"truseo_locale":null},"aioseo_breadcrumb":"<div class=\"aioseo-breadcrumbs\"><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb\">\n\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/\" title=\"Home\">Home<\/a>\n\t\t<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb-separator\">\u00bb<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb\">\n\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/category\/math\/\" title=\"Math\">Math<\/a>\n\t\t<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb-separator\">\u00bb<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb\">\n\t\t\tThe Unbalanced Group Theorem\n\t\t<\/span><\/div>","aioseo_breadcrumb_json":[{"label":"Home","link":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/"},{"label":"Math","link":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/category\/math\/"},{"label":"The Unbalanced Group Theorem","link":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/2026\/10\/28\/the-unbalanced-group-theorem\/"}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/248136","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=248136"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/248136\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":248138,"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/248136\/revisions\/248138"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=248136"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=248136"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.johndcook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=248136"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}]