From Merlin Mann:
If you’ve got more than two priorities, you might as well think you have more than two arms.
Related posts:
Task switching
Four reasons we don’t apply the 80/20 rule
The blog of John D. Cook
The blog of John D. Cook
From Merlin Mann:
If you’ve got more than two priorities, you might as well think you have more than two arms.
Related posts:
Task switching
Four reasons we don’t apply the 80/20 rule
{ 1 trackback }
{ 7 comments… read them below or add one }
John S. 03.25.11 at 07:48
I get the point but isn’t that kind of arbitrary? Could easily say if you have more than ten priorities you might as well think you have more than 10 fingers.
Kamil 03.25.11 at 10:08
Great find
I think you’ve nailed it !
Keith 03.25.11 at 10:08
Curious as to when/where he said this, and in what context.
John 03.25.11 at 11:14
John: Two is kinda arbitrary, but he’s trying to be provocative, not precise. I think the point is that the number of true priorities you can have is small, maybe much smaller than you might think.
In defense of “two” in particular, IBM did a study once that concluded that that’s the optimal number of projects. It provides some variety, and something to do when one project gets blocked. But as the number of projects increases, people spend more time task-switching and less actually getting work done.
EastwoodDC 03.25.11 at 14:53
Taking this to the other extreme …
“If you’ve got more than 100 billion priorities, you might as well think you have more than 100 billion neurons.”
… I think it works better with two.
John V. 03.25.11 at 17:06
Or:
“If you’ve got no priorities, you might as well have no hands, fingers, or neurons.”
This reminds me … I forget who, but some famous Comp Sci guy said something like, “I know how to make four horses pull a cart, but I have no idea how to make 1,024 chickens pull one.”
Blaise F Egan 03.26.11 at 01:53
Many years ago I read something about HP employees being given only one objective that would be assessed at their annual appraisal. The idea was that if you had more than one you would have had conflicting priorities. I don’t know if it was true (or still is) but the idea intrigued me, as in my company we’ve always had a long list of objectives.