Randomized trials of parachute use

by John on April 1, 2008

It is widely assumed that parachute use improves your chances of surviving a leap from an airplane. However, a meta analysis suggests this practice is not adequately supported by controlled experiments. See the article Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma related to gravitational challenge: systematic review of randomized controlled trials by Gordon C S Smith and Jill P Pell. The authors summarize their conclusions in the abstract.

As with many interventions intended to prevent ill health, the effectiveness of parachutes has not been subjected to rigorous evaluation by using randomised controlled trials. Advocates of evidence based medicine have criticised the adoption of interventions evaluated by using only observational data. We think that everyone might benefit if the most radical protagonists of evidence based medicine organised and participated in a double blind, randomised, placebo controlled, crossover trial of the parachute.

{ 2 trackbacks }

Some programmers really are 10x more productive — The Endeavour
01.10.11 at 06:21
Się żyje « historiazprzegladarki
06.11.11 at 06:36

{ 2 comments… read them below or add one }

1

Michael Harris 04.01.08 at 06:15

This is a Douglas Adams-worthy commentary of medical geek-speak! I love it!

2

@IsaacG2 09.07.10 at 10:01

I’m pretty sure they save lives in sky diving…

Leave a Comment

You can use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>