Post minimalism

I’m suspicious of terms that start with “post-“. Often these terms are pretentious and inaccurate. When someone says, for example, that we’ve moved into a post-X era, they often mean that they didn’t like X and would like to think it’s gone.

Despite my misgivings about post-this and post-that, I smiled the other day when I heard some music described as “post-minimalist chamber music.” What I like about it is the idea of pursuing things to their most basic elements, then backing off a bit. Minimalist music drives me crazy after a while, but minimalist-inspired music with a little more variety can be pleasant to listen to.

In general, minimalism tends to be harsh. For example, minimalist architecture can be stark and cold. But not-quite-so-minimal architecture, spare but humane, can be beautiful. You could say the same of minimalism as a lifestyle. Taken to extremes, it’s ugly. But a more moderate and graceful form of minimalism is beautiful.

More posts on moderating minimalism

3 thoughts on “Post minimalism

  1. What minimalist / post-minimalist music are you talking about here? When I read this I’d think of Steve Reich / Nils Frahm but that may not at all be what you meant.

  2. I was listening to the New Sounds podcast I wrote about here. The latest podcast from New Sounds also has some “post minimalist” music, though they didn’t use that term. I think they called it “minimalist inspired”.

  3. In music, I find the “minimalist fathers”, e.g. Terry Riley and La Monte Young to be less harsh, while simultaneously comparably (or in La Monte’s case, more) minimal than some of their next-generation followers.

    I wonder if the harshness partially resulted not from minimalism itself per se, but because minimalism attracted reductionists (for obvious reasons), who in turn tended to produce “cold” music.

Comments are closed.